Critics say Princeton again advances claim Israel harvests Palestinian organs

A forthcoming Princeton University course reading list includes a book that peddles “age-old antisemitic blood libels,” according to Arsen Ostrovsky. And it’s not the first time.

McCosh 50, the largest lecture hall on campus, renovated in 2021. Credit: Politics Is Exciting via Wikimedia Commons.
McCosh 50, the largest lecture hall on campus, renovated in 2021. Credit: Politics Is Exciting via Wikimedia Commons.

A 2017 book that is part of a sample reading list for an upcoming Princeton University humanities course has drawn charges of antisemitic blood libels. It also raises broad questions about academic freedom and what kinds of scholarship are appropriate for classroom study.

The controversy surrounds The Right to Maim: Debility, Capacity, Disability, by Jasbir Puar, a professor of women’s and gender studies and director of the graduate program in women’s and gender studies at Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey. Duke University Press, which published the book, refers to it as a “pathbreaking” study of disability, which draws “on a stunning array of theoretical and methodological frameworks.”

“Puar’s analysis culminates in an interrogation of Israel’s policies toward Palestine, in which she outlines how Israel brings Palestinians into biopolitical being by designating them available for injury,” the press states. “Supplementing its right to kill with what Puar calls the right to maim, the Israeli state relies on liberal frameworks of disability to obscure and enable the mass debilitation of Palestinian bodies.”

With Edward Said’s 1978 work Orientalism and others, the book is listed on a “sample reading list” for the Princeton course “The Healing Humanities: Decolonizing Trauma Studies from the Global South,” taught by Satyel Larson, assistant professor of Near Eastern studies at Princeton. The course is listed as an offering in fall 2023-24.

“Re-orienting healing as a decolonizing process enables students to re-politicize personal trauma as it intersects with global legacies of violence, war, racism, slavery, patriarchy, colonialism, orientalism, homophobia, ableism, capitalism, and extractivism,” per a description of the course on the Princeton site. “The course participates in a new project to help illuminate how the humanities itself can offer new paths to understanding trauma and healing.”

Arsen Ostrovsky, CEO of the International Legal Forum, shared a letter with JNS that he penned to Christopher Ludwig Eisgruber, president of Princeton, and Behrooz Ghamari-Tabrizi, chair of the university’s Near Eastern studies department.

“The book in question contains a number of very serious and defamatory accusations, primarily that the Israel Defense Forces is harvesting the organs of Palestinians, including by ‘shooting to maim, rather than to kill,’ in order to create a ‘mass debilitation of Palestinian bodies,’” Ostrovsky wrote. “This charge is not only demonstrably false, but a modern-day antisemitic blood libel.”

He told JNS that the forum was “requesting that the book be removed, not as part of a debate about the limits of free speech on campus, but because of its lack of educational value and potential for incitement to racial hatred and violence against the Jewish community by the use of age-old antisemitic blood libels.”


“Puar’s book is filled with anti-Israel falsehoods. Mandating your students to read this antisemitic book will likely lead them to unwarranted animosity toward Israel and Jews,” wrote Morton Klein,
national president of the Zionist Organization of America, with Susan Tuchman, director of the Center for Law and Justice, and Jonathan Ginsburg, managing director of ZOA Campus, in a letter to Larson, the Princeton professor.

“We strongly urge you to replace Puar’s book with a book that is based on the facts,” the three wrote.

The group also noted that Puar accuses Israel of “the twisted notion of ‘pinkwashing,'” that “Israel is an exemplary protector of LGBTQ rights—unlike all other nations in the Middle East where LGBTQ people are treated as criminals, subjected to persecution and violence, and even killed—purportedly to distract from its alleged oppression of the Palestinian Arab people.”

The group concluded by urging Princeton to rethink the “misguided and dangerous decision.”

“If the goal is to educate, rather than indoctrinate Princeton students with false anti-Israel propaganda, then there are accurate books about the Israeli-Palestinian Arab conflict to include on your syllabus,” they wrote. “Puar’s book is not worthy of a place on any reading list at Princeton and should be removed from yours.”

‘Students shortchanged by virulently anti-Israel syllabi’

Ostrovsky told JNS that he has read parts of the book that relate to Israel and has reviewed comments from the publisher and author, as well as external reviews.

“There are circumstances where, depending on context, it is appropriate to teach antisemitic material, provided there is an educational or scholarly component to it,” he told JNS. “In this case, we do not believe there was any such educational merit to it, for reasons explained in the letter.”

In the letter, Ostrovsky noted that Princeton hosted a lecture in February by Mohammed El-Kurd, “a notorious Jerusalem-based Palestinian activist, whom the Anti-Defamation League has called an ‘unvarnished, vicious’ antisemite, and who himself has also sickeningly accused Israelis of harvesting and eating the organs of Palestinians.”

Miriam Elman. Credit: Academic Engagement Network.

Duke University Press, Princeton University and the author of the book did not respond to queries from JNS. An email to the professor teaching the Princeton course returned an automatic response: “Thank you for your email. Please expect a response to non-urgent matters within 1-2 business days. Thanks for your patience.”

Rutgers confirmed to JNS the book author’s current employment at the university but declined to comment on the charges that her work is antisemitic.

“Every semester, on campuses across the United States, students are shortchanged by their biased, one-sided and virulently anti-Israel syllabi that present materials uncritically,” wrote Miriam Elman, executive director of the Academic Engagement Network, on X (formerly Twitter).

“The proposed (now vetted and approved) course isn’t focused on Israel, but is reportedly an anthropology course with cross-national case studies on ‘decolonizing trauma,’” she wrote. “To be clear, faculty have the academic freedom to teach course material in their area of expertise as they see fit. They get to choose and select topics, readings. But they don’t have a right to be free of criticism, and this Princeton syllabus deserves to be critiqued!”

“The instructor is apparently still junior faculty, not yet tenured. She is learning, needs mentoring,” Elman added. “Senior faculty and curriculum vetting committees could help here with syllabi recommendations.”

“Welcome to one of America’s top educational institutions, Princeton … where they teach that ‘Israel harvests Palestinian organs,’” wrote Adam Milstein, who co-founded an eponymous family foundation. “No, it’s not a joke. This blood libel is actually on the syllabus for a humanities course this coming year.”

You have read 3 articles this month.
Register to receive full access to JNS.

Just before you scroll on...

Israel is at war.

JNS is combating the stream of misinformation on Israel with real, honest and factual reporting. In order to deliver this in-depth, unbiased coverage of Israel and the Jewish world, we rely on readers like you.

The support you provide allows our journalists to deliver the truth, free from bias and hidden agendas. Can we count on your support?

Every contribution, big or small, helps remain a trusted source of news you can rely on.

Become a part of our mission by donating today
Thank you. You are a loyal JNS Reader.
You have read more than 10 articles this month.
Please register for full access to continue reading and post comments.
Never miss a thing
Get the best stories faster with JNS breaking news updates