Haaretz is often described, both in Israel and abroad, as Israel’s finest newspaper. While readers recognize its far-left political bias, many see it as a reliable source to learn about the reality in Israel. They believe that the paper’s reporters, commentators and columnists are professionals who don't fabricate information and that their editors would correct any factual errors.
Unfortunately, this is not the case.
On Jan. 19, the Arab-Israeli Knesset member Ayman Odeh, leader of the Hadash Party, tweeted he was “Happy for the release of the hostages and prisoners.” That sparked an uproar in Israel, and Odeh was condemned from all sides of the political spectrum.
Then Haaretz columnist Carolina Landsmann came to Odeh’s defense. In her Jan. 23 op-ed, she claimed it was just “a trivial tweet by an Arab Israeli who identifies with both sides in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.” That is an interesting description for someone who has put the terrorists being released in the hostage deal on par with kidnapped civilians being held by Hamas.
But the most misleading part of the piece is Landsmann’s depiction of Odeh as “the epitome of Arab-Israeli moderation.”
The epitome of moderation? Anyone who has followed Odeh’s track record knows that he’s a dangerous extremist. Here are a few examples. Odeh headed the “Arab coalition against national service” and ran campaigns among Arab youth against serving in the “racist state that calls itself the ‘Jewish state.’ ”
Odeh praised Hezbollah’s terrorist leader Hassan Nasrallah as a “model of loyalty and sacrifice,” who presented “a unique resistance model.”
He also slammed the Gulf states for defining Hezbollah as a terror group and refused to condemn them. He boycotted the funeral of former Israeli Prime Minister Shimon Peres; visited the incarcerated terrorists Marwan Barghouti and Ahmed Saadat; and called for the release of all prisoners held in Israel, which would include terrorists who slaughtered babies in their cradles during the Hamas-led massacre in southern Israel on Oct. 7, 2023.
This is the epitome of moderation, according to Haaretz.
The newspaper’s obliviousness to empirical reality is also prevalent in the field of law and justice. After Justice Itzhak Amit was appointed as the new head of the Israeli Supreme Court, Chen Ma’anit, Haaretz’s legal correspondent, decided to use the opportunity to condemn Justice Minister Yariv Levin. As Ma’anit wrote on Jan. 27, “Levin apparently managed to achieve one thing in his two-year battle against the Supreme Court: to damage the court’s standing in the eyes of the public.”
Ma’anit may blame Levin for the Israeli public’s distrust in its Supreme Court, but the facts tell a different story.
First, the dramatic loss of trust began in 2012—a decade before Levin took office—and has continued consistently ever since. Secondly, a 2022 academic study that examined data over several decades and was published in the faculty of law journal at the Hebrew University showed that the public’s loss of trust in the Supreme Court—at the rate of over 30%, the worst decline in the world—began with the legal revolution that then-Justice Aharon Barak forced on the public in the early 1990s.
Then there is the field of security and counterterrorism.
An example is a Jan. 28 story by Haaretz’s military correspondent, Yaniv Kubovich, about the current Israeli military operation against terrorist infrastructure in Jenin.
One of the operation’s goals is to hit the “Jenin Battalion,” also known as the “Jenin Brigades,” a terror militia. But according to Haaretz, “no such unit exists.” Kubovich claims that to justify its operation and divert criticism away from the Israeli government, the Israel Defense Forces “rebranded Jenin’s ‘armed thugs’ as Hamas battalion.” In other words, it’s all just smoke and mirrors.
This claim has no basis. The Jenin Brigades militia operates in the city and has been known by that name for several years. It even has Wikipedia entries in Hebrew, English and Arabic. There, it says that the militia was founded in 2021 by Islamic Jihad figure Jamil al-Amori, and serves as an “umbrella formation affiliated with PIJ [Palestinian Islamic Jihad], Hamas and [Fatah’s] Al-Aqsa Martyrs’ Brigades.”
Information on the terror militia appeared online long before the Jenin operation and Haaretz claiming that it is a case of Israeli “rebranding.” In October 2022, the pro-Hamas website Middle East Eye published an article praising the militia, calling it “Palestine’s new resistance.” In July 2022, the Meir Amit Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center posted an investigation into the Jenin Battalion, calling it “a network of armed terrorist operatives in the Jenin refugee camp.”
Additionally, just a few months ago the Palestinian Authority launched an operation against the militia. It was covered by Qatari outlets such as The New Arab and Al Jazeera, which said that “the Jenin Brigades, aka the Jenin Battalion, is an umbrella group that includes Fatah’s Al-Aqsa Martyrs Brigades, Islamic Jihad’s al-Quds Brigades and Hamas’s Qassam Brigades, according to the European Council on Foreign Relations.”
To take Haaretz’s reporting seriously, you’d have to wonder why blatantly anti-Israeli outlets would cooperate with IDF “rebranding” attempts months before they were even needed.
The answer, of course, is that no rebranding ever took place. The existence of the Jenin Battalion is a well-known reality, and Haaretz’s reporting should be taken with large grains of salt.