Opinion

Israel Hayom

Israel’s escalating Lebanese conundrum

The real ‎objective of “Operation Northern Shield” is meant for the ‎international community. The Israeli message is ‎clear: Hezbollah violated U.N. Resolution 1701 ‎‎and ‎breached Israeli sovereignty, and its actions may bring a war ‎to the region.‎

Israeli soldiers in the northern Mount Dov region after an Israel Defense Forces' patrol came under anti-tank fire from Hezbollah terrorist operatives. The Hezbollah attack killed two Israeli soldiers and injured seven others, Jan. 28, 2018. Credit: Basal Awidat/Flash90.
Israeli soldiers in the northern Mount Dov region after an Israel Defense Forces' patrol came under anti-tank fire from Hezbollah terrorist operatives. The Hezbollah attack killed two Israeli soldiers and injured seven others, Jan. 28, 2018. Credit: Basal Awidat/Flash90.
Yoav Limor
Yoav Limor
Yoav Limor is a veteran journalist and defense analyst specializing in Israeli advocacy, global Jewish affairs, and Middle Eastern politics. A passionate advocate for Israel, he frequently appears on radio, television, and in print to provide insightful analysis and counter media bias.

The complex game of chess on the Israel-Lebanon ‎border saw the Israel Defense Forces take one of Hezbollah’s rooks or ‎knights, but not its king or queen.

In other words, ‎while “Operation Northern Shield,” seeking to thwart ‎Hezbollah tunnels ‎snaking under the security fence, marks a serious achievement for Israel and deals ‎Hezbollah a massive blow, it by no means spells the ‎kind of checkmate that could determine the outcome ‎of a future war in Lebanon.

Hezbollah planned its tunnel grid as a strategic ‎surprise (now lost), but that is not what will ‎change its plans. Hezbollah has bigger problems, ‎namely the political turmoil in Lebanon and the ‎economic crisis plaguing it, both of which are ‎aggravated by the looming prospect of a wider-scale ‎Israeli operation against its precision-missile ‎production sites in Lebanon.‎

Israel’s focus on Hezbollah’s missile upgrade ‎efforts was precisely what allowed the IDF to take ‎the Shi’ite terrorist group by surprise on Tuesday.‎ Intelligence about Hezbollah’s tunnel-digging ‎enterprise was diligently gathered and documented ‎over a long period of time, providing conclusive ‎evidence as part of the international public-‎diplomacy campaign Israel is mounting while ‎operations on the ground continue. ‎

With all due respect to IDF bulldozers, the real ‎objective of “Operation Northern Shield” is meant for the ‎international community The Israeli message is ‎clear: Hezbollah violated U.N. Resolution 1701 ‎‎(which ended the 2006 Second Lebanon War) and ‎breached Israeli sovereignty, and its actions may bring a war ‎to the region.‎

Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah and his Iranian ‎patrons remained mum Tuesday, proving they were ‎caught red-handed. It was only last Thursday that ‎Hezbollah urged the Lebanese government to protect ‎its airspace from “Israeli aggression,” and now it ‎turns out it is involved in a highly precarious ‎endeavor. ‎

Israel hopes exposing Hezbollah’s tunnels will spark ‎an internal debate within Lebanon as to the Shi’ite ‎terrorist group’s assertion that it is the country’s ‎‎”defender,” as its actions clearly jeopardize ‎Lebanon’s security.‎

“Operation Northern Shield” is expected to continue for ‎several weeks. The IDF is currently working to ‎neutralize one tunnel near Metula and has several ‎other tunnels in its sights. The operation is ‎currently taking place solely on Israeli soil, but ‎it may entail operating in Lebanese territory as ‎well, something Israel is likely to do only if it is ‎sure Hezbollah would be able to contain such action.‎

This teaches us that deterrence works both ways. The ‎origins of the tunnel breaching Metula is just a few ‎dozen feet from the Lebanese side of the border. ‎Under normal circumstances, the IDF would cross the ‎border and destroy it, but right now it cannot do ‎that, so as to avoid escalation.‎

This is a prudent decision, on two conditions: ‎first, that the tunnels can be completely destroyed ‎from the Israeli side; and second, that Hezbollah will ‎not conclude that Israel is completely averse to ‎operating in Lebanese territory. ‎

Given Hezbollah’s armament efforts, the stakes are ‎much higher and if Hezbollah is led to believe it ‎has any kind of immunity, the price Israel will be ‎made to pay in the future will be much higher.‎

Hezbollah may have wanted to use the tunnels as a ‎tactical instrument, but one must remember that it ‎doesn’t really need them to stage an incursion into ‎an Israeli community near the border. The tunnels’ ‎strength lies in the element of surprise, but ‎Hezbollah’s real strength lies with its sizeable ‎missile arsenal and tens of thousands of operatives. ‎

Israel must focus its efforts on generating ‎deterrence and the fact that the United States is willing to ‎impose new sanctions on Hezbollah will surely help, ‎but the Shi’ite terrorist group will find a way ‎around that as well—that much we know from past ‎experience. ‎

And two side notes: First, speculations that there ‎are ulterior motives to the timing of this operation ‎are baseless. Those in the know are familiar with ‎the timetable and the process that preceded ‎greenlighting this operation; and those who need to ‎know understand that the timing was based on intelligence ‎and technological considerations, and that once the ‎opportunity presented itself, the operation was a ‎go. ‎

Second, the media attention the operation received ‎was a tad overboard. Exposing the tunnels was a ‎significant achievement, but it did not ‎fundamentally change the situation vis-à-vis ‎Hezbollah. Israel still has a myriad of challenges ‎to overcome on the Lebanese front. ‎

Yoav Limor is a veteran Israeli journalist and columnist for Israel Hayom.

The opinions and facts presented in this article are those of the author, and neither JNS nor its partners assume any responsibility for them.
Topics
Comments