The world is at a crossroads regarding the disastrous Iran nuclear deal. As the new U.S. administration considers its options for dealing with an emboldened Iran, the UK government must not be passive in waiting to see which approach the United States takes.
In recent weeks, Iran has escalated its violations of the 2015 nuclear deal—known as the JCPOA—and has enriched uranium up to 20 percent purity, the most significant breach of the deal so far. A nuclear bomb requires uranium enriched to over 90 percent, something experts have now said would take only four months to make.
And recently, The Wall Street Journal revealed that new evidence had recently been uncovered by U.N. inspectors indicating that Iran is engaged in undeclared nuclear activities.
The reality is that the Iranian regime remains a dangerous threat to regional peace. The failed deal is all but dead after the United States rightly withdrew from it under former President Donald Trump. Meanwhile, the United Kingdom, France and Germany look on waiting to see what move the new U.S. administration will make in its dealings with an Iran that is intent on developing its nuclear threat even further.
The Biden administration has repeatedly said that it would seek a “longer and stronger agreement” with Iran if it “returns to strict compliance,” while National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan has said the Biden administration would seek, “to negotiate a follow-on agreement that does materially advance the security of the United States, of Israel and of our other regional partners as well.”
Both statements acknowledge that the JCPOA was fundamentally flawed and promisingly imply a more robust approach to Iran’s nuclear program.
However, eyebrows have been raised in Washington more recently with the appointment of Robert Malley as U.S. special envoy—a known serial Iran appeaser. Meanwhile, Secretary of State Tony Blinken said that if Iran continues to violate the deal, they could be weeks away from a nuclear bomb—implying that a faster return to the agreement is necessary.
In January 2020, British Prime Minister Boris Johnson said that Iran must not be allowed a nuclear weapon and that he would prefer a “Trump deal” instead of the current JCPOA.
“If we’re going to get rid of it, then we need a replacement,” Boris told BBC breakfast. “Let’s replace it with the Trump deal.”
Unfortunately, Britain didn’t support American efforts to extend the arms embargo when it was presented last August at the United Nations. The United States had tried to extend the embargo and snap back sanctions. Consequently, Iran is now more empowered, having its arm strengthened and having a renewed ability to facilitate arms for terror proxies. This destabilizes the prospect of peace in the region and causes a direct threat towards Israel, our allies and U.K. interests worldwide. Shamefully, the United Kingdom appeared to side with Iran on this issue rather than our allies Israel and the United States.
The problem is that Iran has never been in compliance with the Iran deal.
Trump’s firm pressure placed upon Iran for the regime’s misdemeanors has left the Islamic Republic hard-pressed economically. This has put the United States in a strong position at the negotiating table and the new administration must use this leverage to its advantage. American and European partners need to maintain this strong hand in dealing with the Iranian regime otherwise it will continue to think they can get away with continued nuclear blackmail. Capitulation will only reward Tehran and be disastrous for the region and the Iranian people as it continues its catastrophic domestic and foreign policies.
Any new deal with Iran must also recognize that the Middle East landscape is different from that which existed under the Obama administration when the Iran deal was struck. The Abraham Accords mean that the viewpoint of America’s regional allies must be taken into consideration.
Any future deal must also address measurable and permanent reform regarding Iran’s other activities. For example, rather than isolating the nuclear topic believing that other reforms will follow, Iran’s human-rights abuses, support for terrorism and missile programs must also be confronted from the offset. Otherwise, the mistakes of JCPOA will almost certainly be repeated. The false imprisonment of British-born Nazanin Zaghari-Ratcliffe, for example, is one example of why Britain must put forward its own interests in any negotiation with the Islamic Republic. It would be reprehensible for Britain to enter into any agreement without Iran’s human-rights abuses being challenged.
Past compromises have failed. Britain needs to step up and play its own part in ensuring that Iran curbs its regional ambitions, as well as its deplorable torments upon its own people. And unless these conditions are met, Boris Johnson may be faced with “no deal” with Iran is better than a “bad deal.”
Alastair Kirk is the development manager for Christians United for Israel UK, the largest Christian pro-Israel advocacy group in the United Kingdom. Follow him on Facebook at: @ChristiansUnitedforIsraelUK.
Be a part of our community
JNS serves as the central hub for a thriving community of readers who appreciate the invaluable context our coverage offers on Israel and their Jewish world.
Please join our community and help support our unique brand of Jewish journalism that makes sense.