Last month, Rev. Jerry Pillay, former general-secretary of the Uniting Presbyterian Church in Southern Africa, was elected to lead the World Council of Churches. This is a prestigious and influential position. Yet Rev. Pillay has compared Israel’s treatment of Palestinians to “apartheid,” even speaking of the “exclusionary and violent character of the Israeli Zionist project” back in 2016. This should raise concerns for Christians from all backgrounds.
Has the Church not learned by now that anti-Semitism does not mix well with the teachings of Jesus? And that anti-Zionism often masks an underlying anti-Semitism?
This is especially the case regarding Rev. Pillay, who as dean of the University of Pretoria really should know better. After all, as a black South African, he understands the real nature of apartheid and how evil it was. Blacks under South African apartheid had no rights at all.
Such is not remotely the case among Israeli Arabs. They represent 20% of the population and have full legal rights. They are elected and selected as leaders throughout Israeli society at the highest levels, including as members of the government.
There are two Arab parties in the Knesset, while Arab judges serve throughout the Israeli court system, from the Supreme Court all the way down to local labor courts.
Arab Israelis are present in all sectors of the media and active in the healthcare system as well as almost every business sector. Many of them even serve in Israel’s army and security services.
Where is the apartheid?
Sadly, by elevating Rev. Pillay to this senior leadership role in the World Council of Churches, the WCC has also elevated his anti-Zionism and anti-Semitism.
Rev. Pillay could reply that he was speaking only of the treatment of the Palestinians living in the Gaza Strip and Judea-Samaria. But there too, the charges are false, since the Israeli government has sought to find fair and equitable solutions for the people living there, but the Palestinian leadership has consistently let their own people down. Charges of “apartheid” do not apply.
Ironically, but not surprisingly, within days of the announcement that Rev. Pillay would lead the WCC, the U.S. Presbyterian Church’s International Engagement committee approved a statement that “Israel’s laws, policies and practices regarding the Palestinian people fulfill the international legal definition of apartheid” and endorsed the establishment of a “Nakba remembrance day.”
They declared, “Israel’s laws, policies and practices regarding the Palestinian people fulfill the international legal definition of apartheid,” alleging that Palestinians are systematically oppressed with the goal of racial domination.
The PCUSA claims that Arabs living in Israel and biblical Judea and Samaria have “an inferior status” and Palestinians are unable to participate in the “political, social, economic and cultural life of their country.”
Disregarding the fact that Israeli law applies to all Israeli citizens—Arabs and Jews—and that Palestinians are governed by Palestinian Authority laws, the PCUSA claims that two sets of laws exist for Israelis and Palestinians, asserting that these laws oppress and discriminate against the latter.
It also alleges that Palestinian land and water were stolen by “Jewish-only settlements” and that Palestinians were denied freedom of residence and movement, living in “separate reserves and ghettos.” These allegations are as inaccurate and exaggerated as they are ugly, with the vast majority of Palestinians living under the autonomous Palestinian Authority.
Rev. Pillay and the PCUSA go further than the apartheid libel, however. They seem to disregard Palestinian delegitimization of Israel’s very right to exist. And what of the steady stream of attacks against Israeli Jews, often spurred on by the rhetoric of Palestinian leaders? Is there no other side to the story?
Remarkably, despite its extreme biases and, one could argue, heretical beliefs, the PCUSA wants to be a peacemaker. They state that their position “is pursued with the hope it will lead to a peaceful reconciliation for the people of Israel and Palestine similar to that which occurred in South Africa when apartheid was internationally acknowledged.”
So, just as “Christians spoke out in the 1950s against segregation in the United States and later against apartheid in South Africa,” today, “they must again raise their voices and condemn Israel’s discrimination against Palestinians and give a name to the crime against humanity that this discrimination represents, the crime of apartheid.”
“Crime against humanity?” Really?
One of the elements of anti-Semitism is holding Jews to a different standard than others. So we ask, where are the PCUSA resolutions decrying actual crimes against humanity rather than ascribing this hateful allegation only to Israel?
But apparently, it wasn’t enough for PCUSA to misrepresent what apartheid was and how it does not apply to Israel. Its resolution went even further by evoking the Holocaust.
“After World War II when the horror of the Nazi Holocaust was revealed, Jews around the world said ‘never again.’” And this is now being used against the Jewish people in Israel, who are still in a daily fight for survival?
The statement continued, “Christians too vowed that never again would they be silent if a government passed laws establishing and maintaining the domination by one ethnic group over another ethnic group through systematic separation, oppression and denial of basic human rights. Silence in the face of evil was wrong then, and it is wrong now.”
So today, it is the Israeli Jews who are the Nazis and the Palestinians who are the innocent Jews. Does the PCUSA have no shame? Is the denomination that tone deaf to historical and contemporary realities?
And yet there is more.
In order to counter charges that the PCUSA is anti-Semitic, the leaders recommended that the church replace references to anti-Semitism with “anti-Jewish,” asserting that anti-Semitism “encompasses other people groups in addition to our Jewish siblings.”
But as we all know, the term “anti-Semitism” was coined with reference to Jews alone, not all Semitic peoples, such as the Arabs today or the Babylonians of old.
There is no ambiguity here at all, but rather than be charged with anti-Semitism (certainly a fair charge), the PCUSA wants to rewrite the dictionary. Seriously? What would Jesus say?
Michael L. Brown, Ph.D. is host of the Line of Fire radio broadcast and author of Resurrection. Jonathan Feldstein is President and CEO of the Genesis 123 Foundation, Genesis123.co and RunforZion.com.
Be a part of our community
JNS serves as the central hub for a thriving community of readers who appreciate the invaluable context our coverage offers on Israel and their Jewish world.
Please join our community and help support our unique brand of Jewish journalism that makes sense.