(March 22, 2018 / Mida) Israel recently passed legislation giving the Minister of the Interior the authority to revoke the residency of eastern Jerusalem residents involved in terrorism or espionage. This was immediately met with criticism from the European Union, as often happens when it comes to Israel.
The purpose of the law is to target Hamas members living in eastern Jerusalem who are eligible for Israeli-welfare benefits. Residents of Eastern Jerusalem are generally allowed to travel freely, and are entitled to the social and insurance benefits of Israeli citizens. They can also vote in municipal, though not national, elections.
“It would have been better if this vote had never happened, but this vote emerged because of a Supreme Court ruling that overturned the decisions of five interior ministers from various parties,” explained Knesset member Amir Ohana of the Likud Party. He was referring to a September 2017 ruling by the Supreme Court. The ruling said that the Interior Ministry did not have the right to revoke the permanent residency status of four eastern Jerusalem residents with ties to the terrorist group Hamas.
Reacting to the new law, the E.U. published a statement in which it lamented that “The new law could make the residency status of Palestinians in East Jerusalem … even more precarious than it already is today. The new law could be used to further compromise the Palestinian presence in East Jerusalem, which would further undermine the prospects of a two-state solution … ”
In its statement, the E.U. assured that it “rejects terrorism in all its forms.”
If it really means what is says with this statement, the E.U. does so only when the terrorism is directed at anyone other than the Jews. It is difficult to take seriously its claim of “rejecting terrorism,” given its overwhelming political and financial support of one of the world’s arch terrorists, Palestinian Authority leader Mahmoud Abbas.
The EU statement concludes that “…the European Union does not recognize Israel’s sovereignty over the territories occupied by Israel since June 1967, including East Jerusalem, and does not consider them to be part of Israel’s territory, irrespective of their legal status under domestic Israeli law. The European Union will closely monitor if and how this new law is applied to Palestinians in East[ern] Jerusalem.”
The E.U. does not recognize that all of Jerusalem belongs to Israel. The question that is hardly ever asked is why Israel should care, one way or the other, whether it recognizes Israel’s historical, ancient capital of Jerusalem? Or anything else to do with Israel for that matter.
For all of official Europe’s post-colonial guilt, this kind of language—declarations of what the E.U. does and does not find acceptable in the policies and actions of the sovereign state of Israel—is the language of an unrepentant colonialist.
The E.U. uses this kind of language—condescending in its presumption that it is entitled to determine the territory and exact location of the capital of another nation—about Israel all the time. It is automatic, on default.
Israel was a thriving nation in its ancestral homeland long before European civilization decided to set out and colonize large parts of the world. It is, therefore, hugely ironic that the E.U.—a post-national, largely unelected bureaucracy historically rooted in Western Europe that claims to speak for all of Europe today—should be lecturing one of the most ancient surviving civilizations on earth, the Jews, on the status of its ancient capital—or anything else, for that matter.
It would appear that you can take Europe out of the former colonies, but you cannot take the colonialism out of the Europeans. At least, not when it comes to the Jews.
While the Europe of the post-national European Union no longer invades other peoples’ countries in order to colonize them, it still finds it legitimate to aggressively meddle in how other nations, such as Israel, should go about their business.
The E.U. has strong opinions on how Israel should or should not defend itself against terrorism, as its statement about Jerusalem made clear. So while the E.U. is very keen on receiving Israeli assistance to combat terrorism in Europe, it is considerably less so when it comes to Israel defending itself.
Even though colonialism ended a long time ago, the never-ending attempts to pressure Israel into the two-state solution, a tactic that the E.U. has plainly refused to abandon, represents the actions of a colonialist enterprise aimed at beating Israel into what the E.U. considers to be its proper (aka submissive) place.
The E.U. does not fight for Arab human rights, as they claim, because the E.U. is nowhere to be found when it comes to Arab-on-Arab human-rights abuses.
The entire issue is about subjecting Israel to the E.U.’s political will. The moral narcissism of the European Union is no better than the moral narcissism of its colonialist European predecessors. It’s just a different century.
Judith Bergman is a columnist and political analyst
You can find more in depth articles on Israel and the Middle East @en.mida.org.il.