The axis of tyrannies

It will present an enormous challenge to free nations.

The main players shaping the year-long Ukraine war: The United States of America, the European Union, Russia, Iran and China. Credit: Khanthachai C/Shutterstock.
The main players shaping the year-long Ukraine war: The United States of America, the European Union, Russia, Iran and China. Credit: Khanthachai C/Shutterstock.
By Waller R. Newell and Clifford D. May

On Nov. 1, 1936, Italian dictator Benito Mussolini gave a speech celebrating the treaty he had signed with German dictator Adolf Hitler. “This Berlin-Rome protocol is not a barrier, it is rather an axis around which all European States animated by a desire for peace may collaborate on troubles,” he told a cheering crowd. A term was born and, a few years later, the Axis was at war with the Allies.

On Jan. 29, 2002, President George W. Bush revived the term—with a twist. He called Ali Khamenei’s Islamist regime in Iran, Saddam Hussein’s Baathist Iraq and Kim Jong-il’s Communist North Korea—three regimes collaborating against the United States and other free nations—the Axis of Evil.

Today, a new axis has emerged. We might call it the Axis of Tyrannies. It formed a year ago when Xi Jinping and Vladimir Putin signed an agreement stating that henceforth there would be “no limits to Sino-Russian cooperation … no forbidden zones.” The other major tyrant collaborating around this axis is Ali Khamenei—still evil after all these years.

While differing in important ways, these tyrants all subscribe to an authoritarian and collectivist vision of society. All are irrevocably hostile to America and, beyond that, to Enlightenment values of individual rights and democratic governance.

Modern tyrants, like ancient tyrants, wage wars to win glory. But modern tyrants also have an ideological mission. They require the submergence of the individual in the collective through the progressive transformation of human nature. That is why Fascist dictator Mussolini praised Communist dictator Lenin as a “sculptor of men.”

For Russian President Vladimir Putin, the goal is the “new world” of a Eurasianist empire; for China’s President Xi Jinping, the ceaseless extension of his totalitarian “social credit” blueprint and the replacement of the American-led liberal international order with one that is illiberal and whose rules are made in Beijing; for Khamenei, the restoration of a powerful new Islamic empire.

We believe today’s Allies have no more important mission than to stand up to today’s Axis and prevent it from achieving its goals. Whether Allied leaders and those who vote them into office will see that as their priority is difficult to predict.

One encouraging note: All three Axis regimes are experiencing difficulties, none more so than Iran, where the Khamenei dictatorship has been beset not just by an unprecedented demand for rights—women’s rights in particular—but by opposition to clerical rule.

Nevertheless, his regime continues to threaten his neighbors. He provides funds and arms to Palestinian Islamic Jihad, Hamas and of course Hezbollah, through the latter of which he dominates Lebanon—now, and not coincidentally, a failing state.

His forces have propped up the mass-murdering Assad dictatorship in Syria. He arms the Houthi rebels in Yemen. His Shi’ite militias build their power in Iraq.

Most strikingly, his regime has begun supplying Putin with weapons for use in his war to conquer Ukraine—the first direct military incursion into European affairs by a Muslim power since the Ottomans. As a member of the Axis of Tyrannies, he doubtless sees this as his duty. He expects reciprocal benefits.

Xi has revived Maoism, a tyrannical ideology if ever there was one. In a little-noticed move, his official biography was amended to include detailed notes he supposedly made as a young man on Mao Zedong’s teachings.

He egregiously violated international law by abruptly ending Beijing’s treaty obligation to rule Hong Kong under the principle of “one country, two systems.” He is committing what the United States and other Western governments consider to be genocide against the Muslim Turkic people of East Turkistan, which he calls Xinjiang (Chinese for “new borders.”) He is crushing Tibetan culture.

And, of course, he is threatening to invade and conquer Taiwan, which could lead to Beijing’s dominance of Asia, a stepping stone toward global dominance. Xi’s new team is being called his “war cabinet,” and he’s now reportedly considering sending advanced weapons to Russia.

When Putin launched his invasion of Ukraine, he expected—as did many others—a cakewalk. But the Russian military proved inadequate to the task and the Ukrainians have demonstrated astonishing courage and determination in defense of the independence and freedom they have enjoyed since the collapse of the Soviet Union.

Putin’s war has opened fissures at home as he attempts to balance among the regular military, provincial warlords such as Ramzan Kadyrov (a Chechen tyrant and quisling) and the Wagner Group, a private army created—in classic tyrannical fashion—by Yevgeny Prigozhin, an ex-convict who made a fortune as the Kremlin’s caterer.

Of note, the history of tyrannies run from dinner tables includes Cyrus the Great’s gardens, Stalin’s dacha, Hitler’s Alpine vacation home, and Castro’s restaurant-hopping with his entourage in Cuba. Since the tyrant “owns” the entire society, the political is absorbed into his personal household.

The Axis of Tyrannies will no doubt draw lessons from what Putin does or does not achieve. Its leaders will make decisions based on whether the Allies are steadfast in their support of Ukraine over time or confirm the prediction of 9/11 mastermind (and tyrant) Khalid Sheikh Mohammed to his CIA interrogator: “We will win because … we do not need to defeat you militarily; we only need to fight long enough for you to defeat yourself by quitting.”

Unlike elected leaders, tyrants seldom go into comfortable retirement. Of course, that only makes them more determined and indeed desperate to prevail.

The conflict between the Axis and the free nations is likely to be long and challenging. But from the Battle of Salamis to D-Day to the fall of the Berlin Wall, tyrannies have been defeated. Though that may be a cause for optimism, it’s no justification for complacency.

Waller R. Newell, an adjunct fellow at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies (FDD), is a professor of political science and philosophy at Carleton University in Ottawa, Canada. He is the author of “Tyranny and Revolution: Rousseau to Heidegger” and “Tyrants: Power, Injustice and Terror.”

Clifford D. May is founder and president of the Foundation for Defense of Democracies, and a columnist for “The Washington Times.”

The opinions and facts presented in this article are those of the author, and neither JNS nor its partners assume any responsibility for them.
You have read 3 articles this month.
Register to receive full access to JNS.

Just before you scroll on...

Israel is at war. JNS is combating the stream of misinformation on Israel with real, honest and factual reporting. In order to deliver this in-depth, unbiased coverage of Israel and the Jewish world, we rely on readers like you. The support you provide allows our journalists to deliver the truth, free from bias and hidden agendas. Can we count on your support? Every contribution, big or small, helps JNS.org remain a trusted source of news you can rely on.

Become a part of our mission by donating today
Thank you. You are a loyal JNS Reader.
You have read more than 10 articles this month.
Please register for full access to continue reading and post comments.
Never miss a thing
Get the best stories faster with JNS breaking news updates