Newsletter
Newsletter Support JNS
Martin Sherman

Martin Sherman

Martin Sherman spent seven years in operational capacities in the Israeli defense establishment. He is the founder of the Israel Institute for Strategic Studies (IISS), a member of the Habithonistim-Israel Defense & Security Forum (IDSF) research team, and a participant in the Israel Victory Project.

The resurgence of anti-Israel rhetoric in U.S. discourse reflects deeper and troubling currents in American political culture.
Despite decades of proven failure, Israel’s doves cling to their fatally flawed dogma, insisting if only Israel would make more concessions, a new epoch of Judeo-Arab peace and prosperity would dawn.
Considering the Mideast alternatives, having an ostensibly moderate, pro-Western regime installed in Amman has undeniable appeal.
During his tenure, Benjamin Netanyahu has accumulated an impressive record of achievement in virtually every field of endeavor: economic, diplomatic, technological. So what explains all the vehemence?
In many ways, it is Israel’s fractured electorate that has itself to blame for the mess in which it finds itself.
To avert the specter of the depopulation of the south by Jews, Israel must come to terms with the grim realities that prevail in Gaza.
It’s not enough to point out the flaws, however fatal, of the “left.” Rather, the “right” must present the public with a plausible and persuasive alternative that does not merely replace a geographic peril with a demographic one.
In order to allow non-belligerent Gazans to extricate themselves from their existing humanitarian crisis, they should be offered generous relocation grants to allow them and their dependents the opportunity to seek more prosperous and secure lives elsewhere.
For a pro-Israel entity like AIPAC, the issue of bipartisanship is an almost sacred value—the very “holy grail” of its political influence.