Newsletter
Newsletter Support JNS

India eyes joint production of Israeli missile systems

The two allies are negotiating deals for domestic manufacture of LORA theater quasi-ballistic and Ice Breaker cruise missiles.

A rendering of the Ice Breaker cruise missile. Credit: Rafael Advanced Defense Systems.
A rendering of the Ice Breaker cruise missile. Credit: Rafael Advanced Defense Systems.

India is in advanced talks to manufacture LORA (LOng Range Artillery) tactical ballistic missiles on license from Israel Aerospace Industries and Ice Breaker cruise missiles on license from Rafael Advanced Defense Systems as part of its “Make in India” program, Globes reported on Sunday.

The negotiations follow a memorandum of understanding signed on Nov. 4 by Israeli Ministry of Defense Director General Amir Baram and Indian Defense Secretary Rajesh Kumar Singh to boost cooperation.

A delegation from India’s Ministry of Defense recently visited Israel to discuss deals to procure and locally produce both missile systems, according to Globes, citing the India Defence Research Wing website.

India is Israel’s largest defense customer, accounting for about 34% of the Jewish state’s defense exports from 2020 to 2024, according to the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute.

“This strategic dialogue with India takes place at a critical juncture for both countries. Our partnership is based on deep mutual trust and shared security interests,” Baram said. “We view India as a first-rate strategic ally and are determined to continue deepening cooperation in defense, technology and industry.”

The president asked Americans to pay higher gasoline prices for a little longer so that a “very evil country” cannot have nukes.
No injuries were reported. Separately, Israeli soldiers shot dead two terrorists who posed a threat.
“I’m seeing what’s going on in New York,” Stav Cohen, founder of the Israeli nonprofit Frontline Advocates, told JNS. “I fear for my speakers’ lives.”
Mari Leavitt, a Democratic state representative, told JNS that the school “used extremely poor judgment” by inviting Piker and erred by not including mention of Piker’s “dangerous rhetoric” in the initial event announcement.