Newsletter
Newsletter Support JNS

Israeli UN envoy accuses Human Rights Council of ‘systematic discrimination’

In a dramatic parting speech, Israel’s ambassador in Geneva accuses the organization of “institutionalized anti-Semitism.”

The Human Rights and Alliance of Civilizations Room of the Palace of Nations, in Geneva. The room is the meeting place of the U.N. Human Rights Council. Credit: Ludovic Courtès via Wikimedia Commons.
The Human Rights and Alliance of Civilizations Room of the Palace of Nations, in Geneva. The room is the meeting place of the U.N. Human Rights Council. Credit: Ludovic Courtès via Wikimedia Commons.

Israel’s ambassador to the United Nations in Geneva, Aviva Raz Shechter, delivered a strong rebuke of the U.N. Human Rights Council on Sunday in her farewell address to the organization.

Shechter accused the council of unfairly targeting Israel and fostering “institutionalized anti-Semitism” through its notorious Agenda Item 7.

Agenda Item 7 is the only permanent item on the UNHRC agenda against a particular country. It targets Israel and Israel only, and requires Israel’s record on human rights to be debated in practically every meeting of the council.

Shechter called the agenda item “nothing but a systematic mechanism of discrimination against Israel and Israelis, one deeply rooted in the culture of this council and of some of its member states.”

Accusing the UNHRC of aiding and abetting Palestinian recalcitrance, Shechter said, “Let me remind you today, as I am reaching my end of term here, that the United Nations called for the creation of two states in November 1947. The U.N. resolution was accepted by the Jewish side and rejected by the Arab side. The Arab effort to deny and destroy the Jewish State started immediately—and for some, has never ceased—but the fact is, demonstrated over and over at the U.N. Human Rights Council and across the U.N. system—Palestinian leadership and its representatives prefer victimhood to peace, PR stunts to truth, blame games to taking responsibility either for what has been or what could be.”

Shechter concluded her remarks by saying, “I hope and pray that we will find a sustainable compromise and enjoy better days ahead at home and in our region, despite your efforts, and not because of them.”

This article first appeared in Israel Hayom.

“Illicit funds funneled through this network support the regime’s ongoing terrorist operations, posing a direct threat to U.S. personnel, regional allies and the global economy,” the U.S. Treasury Department stated.
The governor’s proposal is a “blatant attempt to push out pro-Israel Democratic champions in Congress,” according to Democratic Majority for Israel, while Republican Jewish Coalition said the reaction was “faux outrage.”
“While Bryn Mawr stands firmly in support of free expression as a hallmark of the student experience, we have clear guidelines around protest,” college president Wendy Cadge wrote.
“Some Florida laws prohibit religious schools from accessing public funds, and we will not enforce unconstitutional laws,” James Uthmeier stated.
U.S. Central Command suspected the container ship of heading to an Iranian port in violation of the U.S. blockade in the Strait of Hormuz.
“There was insufficient information to support the existence of a hostile educational environment” due to an antisemitic post the group shared in March, a school official stated.