Newsletter
Newsletter Support JNS

Netanyahu, Gantz agree: New government to be sworn in on May 13

Reactions pour in from across political spectrum after landmark High Court ruling in favor of coalition deal • Former Justice Minister Ayelet Shaked: “Even the obvious must be stated: This isn’t law, it’s politics.”

The Knesset plenum hall in Jerusalem, on Feb. 10, 2020. Photo by Yonatan Sindel/Flash90.
The Knesset plenum hall in Jerusalem, on Feb. 10, 2020. Photo by Yonatan Sindel/Flash90.

Israel will swear in a national unity government on May 13, agreed Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, and Blue and White Party leader Benny Gantz, late on Wednesday. The parliamentary process for legislating the new government is expected to be completed by Thursday afternoon at the latest.

Earlier Wednesday, Netanyahu and Gantz met in Jerusalem to discuss the changes that could be introduced to their coalition agreement. On the table are senior appointments, the so-called “Norwegian Law” (allowing ministers or deputy ministers to resign from the Knesset but remain minister, with their Knesset seat being taken by the next person on the party’s list), the Health Ministry portfolio and the possibility of extending the next government’s term to four and a half years, to be split evenly between Likud and Blue and White.

Following the High Court of Justice’s late-night unanimous ruling on Wednesday rejecting all petitions against Netanyahu forming a government while under indictment and against the coalition agreement, the reactions from across the political spectrum were quick to follow.

Former Justice Minister Knesset member Ayelet Shaked of Yamina welcomed the court’s decision, tweeting, “Even the obvious must be stated: This isn’t law, it’s politics. The arguments that were made in this petition turn the political process into a legal process, and it’s good that the court abstained from intervening. Giving the prime minister the mandate [for forming the next government] is the apex of a clear political process that implements the will of the people.”

Culture and Sports Minister Miri Regev (Likud) also welcomed the ruling, tweeting, “The judges in Jerusalem did well not to intervene. There’s a sovereign entity in Israel, the people, and they said their piece.”

On the other side of the political aisle, Meretz Knesset member Tamar Zandberg expressed her disappointment, tweeting, “I respect the High Court of Justice’s decision. Even if it’s legal for someone indicted on corruption charges to form a government, it doesn’t make the stench more bearable. Tonight [Wednesday] too, anyone lending Netanyahu a hand is a partner to corruption.”

Former Meretz head Zahava Galon said, “The moral injustice of allowing a man accused of crimes of moral turpitude to ... serve as prime minister cannot be decided by any court, even if the ruling was made [unanimously] by 11 judges.”

The Movement for Quality Government in Israel, one of the petitioners, tweeted that although it would respect the High Court’s ruling, from a moral perspective “it’s impossible to accept a situation where a prime minister is suspected of crimes. The Netanyahu-Gantz government is the essence of the phrase ‘it’s kosher but it still stinks.’ On Saturday night, May 9, we will hold a large rally at Rabin Square [in Tel Aviv] under the banner of ‘Israel is ashamed.’ ”

This article first appeared in Israel Hayom.

Jerusalem cut contact with the top E.U. diplomat after reports she called Israel an apartheid state, exposing growing tensions with Brussels.
Rabbi Zushe Cunin, of the Chabad Jewish Community Center of Pacific Palisades, told JNS that there has been “tremendous anxiety” in the community over Bruce Lion’s behavior.
“At our own endorsement meeting, when asked to condemn Hamas and its Oct. 7th attacks, she point-blank refused, turning the question into yet another attack on Israel,” the Broadway Democrats wrote about their decision not to endorse Darializa Avila Chavelier, who is running for Congress in New York.
“Even if any Arab or Palestinian thinks that injustice has befallen them because of the existence of the state of Israel, moving on and forgetting about the injustice is much more in their interest than looking backwards,” Hussain Abdul-Hussain, author of The Arab Case for Israel, told JNS.
A month after his father was killed in a Queens park, Tzvi Yonie Itzkowitz told JNS that his family believes that the still-unsolved killing was motivated by Jew-hatred.
“The gravity of the situation and its widespread impact on our school community make this not the right time for a celebration,” the school stated in an email to parents.