U.S. immigration authorities last week canceled the visa of Brown University doctor Rasha Alawieh and refused her return to the United States from Lebanon, where she attended the funeral rally of Hezbollah terror chief Hassan Nasrallah. The New York Times and PBS news coverage of her deportation claimed she was only in Lebanon visiting family.
Likewise, when U.S. immigration authorities arrested rabid Hamas supporter Mahmoud Khalil and revoked his visa and green card, the media and progressive NGOs protested the United States was depriving Khalil of freedom of speech. They neglected to mention allegations he committed unlawful acts at Columbia University and supported the savage war crimes of Hamas.
Many leftists, including members of the Democratic Party and civil rights organizations argue that Khalil is being persecuted merely for supporting Palestinians. Indeed, Brian Hauss, attorney at the American Civil Liberties Union, said of the Trump administration, “No president can be allowed to set an ideological litmus test and exclude or remove people from our country with whom they disagree.”
Similarly, many progressive media condemned Khalil’s arrest and detention. The New Yorker, for example, called Khalil’s detention “a flagrant assault on free speech.” David French, opinion columnist in The New York Times, wrote, “The Trump administration is targeting a former Columbia student—and the university itself—as a test case for its new authoritarian regime.”
In fact, Khalil’s arrest and pending deportation have no connection to free speech. Rather, they are meant to ensure that visitors given the privilege of residing in the United States do not abuse their welcome, or federal immigration statutes, by promoting terrorism and breaking laws.
Disingenuous attempts by media, NGOs and progressive politicians to mount false defenses of speech freedom misrepresent the issue. Guests in the United States, on visas or green cards, are not citizens and not entitled to citizenship rights. They are required to comply with local laws and not provide support to terrorist organizations or entities that threaten national security.
Let’s be clear: Those who support Alaweih and Khalil are abetting some of the world’s most vicious war criminals—terrorists who murdered, raped, incinerated, kidnapped and tortured American citizens. This isn’t about free speech, it’s about protecting our country—legally—from radicals who militantly oppose it.
Khalil openly and aggressively supported a terrorist enemy of the U.S. He distributed Hamas propaganda, including a document titled “Our Narrative … Operation Al-Aqsa Flood” with the logo of the “Hamas Media Office” on it. A video post on X shows Khalil justifying Hamas terrorism, saying, “We’ve tried armed resistance, which is legitimate under international law, but Israel calls it terrorism.”
Khalil is one of the prominent leaders in Columbia University Apartheid Divest (CUAD), which dedicates itself to overthrowing Western civilization and declared its support for Hamas on several occasions. Earlier this month, he helped illegally occupy a building at Barnard College, an affiliate of Columbia, protesting the expulsion of anti-Israel students for disrupting a classroom and distributing pro-Hamas propaganda.
Outrageously, the mainstream media describe this activity merely as “pro-Palestinian.” A NewsBusters study of 28 protest stories of PBS News Hour coverage in the spring of 2024, for example, found 29 uses of “pro-Palestinian” labels and zero uses of “pro-Hamas.” Why does mainstream media whitewash support for terrorists?
Breaking the law and breaching school policies do not constitute free speech. A letter signed by more than 100 House Democrats accuses the Trump administration of arresting and detaining Khalil “simply for exercising his First Amendment right to free speech.”
In fact, Khalil was reputedly a ringleader in the takeover of Columbia’s Hamilton Hall and the illegal encampment on campus. Columbia’s rules prohibit unauthorized gatherings, disruptions of university functions and occupation of campus spaces without permission.
As a highly visible spokesperson in these activities, Khalil is almost surely guilty of violating Title VI, which prohibits discrimination based on ethnicity, religion, race, and national origin. Indeed, Jewish students were regularly harassed by Khalil’s gang of pro-Hamas thugs, who termed their encampment a “Zionist-free zone,” and denied access to Jewish “Zionist” students.
None of these violations constitutes free speech. In fact, it was Khalil and company who violated the rights of others by creating an environment in which Jewish students—and anyone who supports Israel—feared for their safety.
Khalil’s case has nothing to do with free speech. Last week, a CNN article claimed that in light of Khalil’s case, students are now “being forced to think carefully before exercising their constitutionally protected right to free speech.” But Khalil’s case has no connection to free speech. Rather, it is about violating immigration laws.
As a green card holder, he does not enjoy the same right to free speech accorded to U.S. citizens. Under the Immigration and Nationality Act, Khalil can be deported for engaging in “criminal activity which endangers public safety or national security” or “any activity a purpose of which is the opposition to, or the control or overthrow of, the Government of the United States by force, violence, or other unlawful means … .”
Khalil can also be deported for endorsing and espousing terrorist activity and/or for persuading others to do so or to support a terrorist organization. Finally, the U.S. Secretary of State can order deportation if he has reasonable grounds to believe Khalil’s presence has serious adverse U.S. foreign policy consequences.
Free speech in the United States is not under threat. Yet, we see headlines like The Guardian’s “The US assault on free speech is not going to end with Mahmoud Khalil” and Bloomberg’s “Columbia student’s deportation arrest should scare all Americans.” This is clearly an attempt to panic the public by asserting their First Amendment rights are being attacked. The truth: The U.S. government is attacking foreign lawbreakers and terrorism supporters like Khalil— not the right to free speech.
Residing in the United States is not a right, it’s a privilege—Visitors are subject to certain obligations, which include refraining from supporting terrorism or breaking the law. Khalil failed to fulfill these obligations and will suffer the consequences.
Visa and green card holders like Khalil, who violate these rules, deserve to be deported immediately, as they have violated a sacred trust and endangered us, their hosts. Officials and media who defend such foreign violators—supporters of U.S.-designated terrorist organizations and supporters of violence and law-breaking—betray their profession and the public trust.
Originally published by Facts and Logic About the Middle East (FLAME).