Newsletter
Newsletter Support JNS

House Armed Services chair rejects claims NDAA provision would put Israel in command of US military

Section 224 of the National Defense Authorization Act “simply adds transparency and improves efficiency by designating a single official to coordinate existing initiatives,” Rep. Mike Rogers said.

U.S. Israeli Flags
Israeli Chief of Defense, Lt. Gen. Gadi Eizenkot, meets with U.S. Marine Gen. Joseph F. Dunford Jr., chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, in his office at the Israeli Defense Forces military headquarters in Tel Aviv, Israel, Oct. 18, 2015. Credit: D. Myles Cullen/U.S. Defense Department.

Rep. Mike Rogers (R-Ala.) is pushing back on claims that a provision in the fiscal year 2027 National Defense Authorization Act would cede control of U.S. military operations to Israel.

“Israel is far and away the best ally the United States has in the Middle East, and our cooperative programs with them strengthen our national security by giving our warfighters access to cutting-edge technologies,” Rogers, chairman of the House Armed Services Committee, wrote.

Rogers said Section 224 of the House committee’s NDAA draft, titled the “United States-Israel Defense Technology Cooperation Initiative,” does not create new Defense Department programs or transfer authority over U.S. forces.

“It simply adds transparency and improves efficiency by designating a single official to coordinate existing initiatives,” Rogers said. “In no way does it give away command and control of our military operations, personnel or equipment.”

The provision would require the secretary of defense to designate an executive agent to coordinate U.S.-Israeli defense technology cooperation, including joint research, development, testing, evaluation, integration and industrial partnerships. The measure also calls for identifying jointly developed or Israeli-origin technologies that could be integrated into U.S. military systems.

Rogers called claims that it would place the U.S. military under Israeli control “categorically false and misleading.”

“Misinformation in relation to Israel and our close partnership with them has always run rampant, and bad actors are all too happy to stoke these flames when given the opportunity,” he wrote.

Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.) stated on June 1 that he is working with Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.) to introduce an amendment striking Section 224 from the defense bill. Khanna has argued that the provision would deepen military integration between the two countries, describing it as a “fusion” of the U.S. and Israeli militaries.

The dispute comes as the House Armed Services Committee prepares to mark up the fiscal 2027 NDAA on June 4.

The Republican Jewish Coalition commended Rogers for “setting the record straight.”

“Section 224 strengthens American national security by deepening defense-tech cooperation with our closest ally in the Middle East,” the group stated. “The bad-faith claims about ‘ceding control’ are categorically false. The U.S.-Israel alliance makes both nations safer, stronger and more secure.”

AIPAC also thanked the congressman for “prioritizing initiatives that help make America safer and stronger.”

“Further partnering with our democratic ally Israel on defense issues helps give our troops a strategic advantage and helps modernize our military,” the organization stated.

Morton Klein, national president of the Zionist Organization of America, told JNS that the memorandum of understanding is a “disaster” that “stabs Israel in the back.”
“You can’t send an 18-year-old off to college without filling in many blanks before they leave, about why being Jewish is important,” the longtime Jewish communal leader told JNS.
“I am the one always encouraging students to get comfortable with opposing ideas,” a professor at Seattle Central College told JNS. “This is not it.”
“The defendant exploited the barbaric acts of terror perpetrated on Oct. 7, 2023, to attract donors to his fraudulent ‘humanitarian’ causes,” the U.S. Justice Department alleged.
A transcript of the deal’s text read aloud by a senior U.S. official in a call with reporters on June 17.
“Am I going to say I’m going to take you to court?” the U.S. president told reporters at the G7 summit in France. “No, we’re going to bomb the hell out of them if they violate the agreement.”