Newsletter
Newsletter Support JNS

Reform movement warns anti-AIPAC rhetoric among Democrats risks crossing into Jew-hatred

To “disproportionately demonize AIPAC as a distinctively harmful dark-money entity crosses the line into antisemitic tropes about sinister Jewish political influence,” the URJ stated.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu speaks at the AIPAC Conference in Washington D.C., on March 6, 2018. Credit: Haim Zach / GPO.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu speaks at the AIPAC Conference in Washington D.C., on March 6, 2018. Credit: Haim Zach / GPO.

The Union for Reform Judaism warned on Monday that Democratic criticism of the American Israel Public Affairs Committee singles out the pro-Israel organization and, in some cases, crosses over into antisemitism.

The Reform movement stated that it is “deeply concerned” by efforts to portray AIPAC as uniquely malign in campaign finance debates, as political rhetoric around Israel intensifies.

“Every candidate has the right to accept or reject funding from any PAC, including AIPAC’s, but the harsh language being used by some to denigrate and vilify AIPAC borders on—and in some instances crosses over into—antisemitism,” the URJ stated.

The statement followed a recent Democratic National Committee meeting at which several resolutions critical of Israel and AIPAC were introduced but ultimately shelved.

“We are pleased that this effort failed,” the URJ stated. “Just as one can oppose AIPAC in good faith, one can oppose and forcefully criticize specific Israeli policies and still support a democratic, pluralistic Jewish state of Israel and a strong U.S.-Israel relationship.”

The group warned that to “disproportionately demonize AIPAC as a distinctively harmful dark-money entity crosses the line into antisemitic tropes about sinister Jewish political influence.”

The debate reflects broader divisions among Democrats and Jewish advocacy groups. The liberal pro-Israel group J Street has endorsed candidates more critical of Israeli government policy and has polled Jewish voters on AIPAC’s role in Democratic primaries.

In a recent survey, J Street asked whether voters support AIPAC spending money—some of it raised from Republican donors—against candidates critical of the Israeli government. The group said 40% of Jewish voters were less likely to support candidates endorsed by AIPAC, while about two-thirds opposed such spending.

AIPAC rejected the findings, calling the survey question a “push poll” and reiterating that it “is a bipartisan organization that supports a strong U.S.-Israel partnership.”

“Our members back candidates who want to strengthen the alliance and oppose those who don’t,” AIPAC wrote.

“I wanted to make the most of my time here and use the platform of the United Nations not just to talk about Israel but also to highlight the humanity and commonality between the people of Israel and the people of Iran,” he told JNS.
“The man with a Nazi tattoo is lecturing on war crimes,” stated Yaakov Kaplan, a member of Brooklyn Community Board 12.
Yishay Ishi Ron’s book, “The Girl Who Rode the White Lion,” is based on a true story of a family that hid Jews in a circus during the Holocaust.
The lawmakers sent a letter to the U.S. Department of Homeland Security accusing the administration of influencing a court’s decision to deport the anti-Israel activist.
The measure “does not serve the cause of peace in the Middle East, help feed Gazans or work toward the outcomes Ireland says it seeks,” a State Department spokesperson told JNS.
“No more giving cover to our enemies at the Shabbat table,” said the founder of Antisemitism Watch.