Newsletter
Newsletter Support JNS

Stefanik, Comer launch Harvard bias probe

“If Harvard, or any institution for that matter, does not wish to comply with this basic legal obligation, the proper avenue for achieving this is simple: do not take federal financial assistance,” the lawmakers wrote.

Elise Stefanik
Rep. Elise Stefanik (R-N.Y.) asks a question during a House committee hearing about antisemitism on campus with the presidents of Harvard, Penn and MIT, Dec. 5, 2023. Credit: Courtesy of the office of Rep. Stefanik.

Reps. Elise Stefanik (R-N.Y.) and James Comer (R-Ky.) announced on Thursday that they would launch a House oversight investigation of Harvard University the Ivy League school rejected the Trump administration’s conditions to restore federal funding.

Comer, chairman of the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, and Stefanik, chairwoman of House Republican Leadership, wrote to Harvard president Alan Garber demanding records of Harvard communications about antisemitism on campus, the admittance of foreign students who support terrorism or hate Jews and the university’s diversity, equity and inclusion practices.

“Harvard is apparently so unable or unwilling to prevent unlawful discrimination that the institution, at your direction, is refusing to enter into a reasonable settlement agreement proposed by federal officials intended to put Harvard back in compliance with the law,” the duo wrote. “No matter how entitled your behavior, no institution is entitled to violate the law.”

Comer and Stefanik allege that Harvard’s policies violate Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which bars federal funding to any program that discriminates on the basis of race, color or national origin, and that the university is therefore ineligible to receive federal dollars.

“If Harvard, or any institution for that matter, does not wish to comply with this basic legal obligation, the proper avenue for achieving this is simple: do not take federal financial assistance,” they wrote.

Garber wrote an open letter to the Harvard community on Monday explaining why he had rejected the Trump administration’s wide ranging demands for change, which included achieving viewpoint diversity in hiring and admissions and reforms to programs that it alleged “most fuel antisemitic harassment or reflect ideological capture.”

“The administration’s prescription goes beyond the power of the federal government. It violates Harvard’s First Amendment rights and exceeds the statutory limits of the government’s authority under Title VI,” Garber wrote. “No government, regardless of which party is in power, should dictate what private universities can teach, whom they can admit and hire and which areas of study and inquiry they can pursue.”

The administration subsequently froze more than $2.2 billion in federal funding to the university and is reportedly considering stripping the school’s tax-exempt status.

Dan Sohail faces a maximum penalty of up to three years in prison and mandatory restitution, according to the U.S. Department of Justice.
The award “is a personal recognition and does not imply support or opposition to any policy or country,” the U.S. Embassy to the Holy See said.
Rand Paul’s son, William Paul, allegedly told the New York congressman, who is not Jewish, that “you Jews” would be responsible if Rep. Thomas Massie loses his Kentucky primary race.
“Sheikh bin Zayed, his family members and other dignitaries welcomed us and were happy to see the prime minister of Israel on their soil,” Netanyahu’s former spokesman wrote following the UAE Foreign Ministry’s statement.
“Every day the British Parliament fails to vote on this legislation is another day that the IRGC evades the full impact of our nations’ combined sanctions,” the lawmakers wrote.
“The defendant is a hate-mongering menace, who intended to hurt and kill children in the Jewish community and in other minority communities in New York City,” stated the U.S. attorney for the Eastern District of New York.