Newsletter
Newsletter Support JNS

Israel, Lebanon and possible normalization

A strategic shift reflects Jerusalem’s desire to bolster President Joseph Aoun’s position against armed groups in coordination with the U.S.

Newly elected Lebanese president Joseph Aoun reviews an honor guard upon his arrival at the Presidential Palace in Baabda, east of Beirut, on Jan. 9, 2025. Photo by Fadel Itani/AFP via Getty Images.
Newly elected Lebanese president Joseph Aoun reviews an honor guard upon his arrival at the Presidential Palace in Baabda, east of Beirut, on Jan. 9, 2025. Photo by Fadel Itani/AFP via Getty Images.

Israel is taking steps toward possible normalization with Lebanon, as diplomatic representatives will replace military officials in upcoming negotiation talks.

A diplomatic source confirmed to Israel Hayom on Wednesday that these discussions aim to transition to a political-diplomatic track. Our sources have learned that the next meeting will feature an Israeli diplomatic representative instead of an IDF official, marking an immediate elevation in the talks’ significance.

The strategic shift reflects Israel’s desire to bolster the Lebanese president’s position against armed groups in coordination with the U.S., perhaps paving the way for future normalization of relations between the countries. Israeli officials point to significant changes in Lebanon’s internal political landscape, noting that Hezbollah‘s political influence has weakened considerably.

But on Wednesday, Lebanon responded to statements made by an Israeli political source who expressed interest in advancing normalization between the countries. Officials in Beirut categorically denied that the indirect dialogue with Jerusalem would lead to normalization.

Sources in the Lebanese presidential office told Al-Mayadeen channel that assertions about dialogue committees between Israel and Lebanon serving as a prelude to normalization are unfounded. According to these sources, the three committees established to resolve existing issues with Israel represent a continuation of implementing U.N. Security Council Resolution 1701. The sources emphasized that these committees will not involve direct negotiations between Lebanon and Israel.

“The committees will address longstanding issues—specifically border disputes and points that have remained contentious since 2006,” the officials said.

While seeking to strengthen moderate elements within Lebanon, Israel remains aware of Hezbollah’s continued presence in the region. As a security precaution, despite ongoing negotiations, Israel maintains five strategic positions inside Lebanese territory. The discussions surrounding key positions do not automatically mean Israel will relinquish these areas—Israeli negotiators are expected to present their own security demands to protect border communities.

Originally published by Israel Hayom.

“Such hate has no place in our schools or our state, especially as we begin Jewish American Heritage Month,” said Maryland Gov. Wes Moore.
“While our ability to provide additional information at this time is limited, we will continue to keep the community informed,” the private D.C. university stated.
“This is not a prank. It was an act of intimidation meant to spread fear,” Vince Gasparro, a Liberal parliamentarian, told JNS.
“We welcomed this traitor into our nation with open arms,” the U.S. attorney for the Eastern District of Michigan said. “And he repaid us by building a bomb and helping our great enemy.”
The “failed approach” to lasting peace between the countries has “allowed terrorist groups to entrench and enrich themselves, undermine the authority of the Lebanese state and endanger Israel’s northern border,” said State Department spokesman Tommy Pigott.
“One has to wonder how that humble pie tastes for the Democrats today,” Sam Markstein of the Republican Jewish Coalition told JNS.