Newsletter
Newsletter Support JNS

Airbnb sued for discrimination in US federal court over boycott of Judea and Samaria rentals

The 18 plaintiffs filed the matter in the District Court for the District of Delaware, alleging the company is violating the Fair Housing Amendments Act of 1988.

Airbnb logo. Credit: Screenshot.
Airbnb logo. Credit: Screenshot.

A group of Israeli-Americans has filed a lawsuit in the U.S. federal court against the vacation rental-property website Airbnb, accusing it of discriminating through its decision this month to delist some 200 properties in Judea and Samaria.

The 18 plaintiffs filed the matter in the District Court for the District of Delaware, alleging the company is violating the Fair Housing Amendments Act of 1988, a federal statute that safeguards against discrimination in housing sales and the rental market, in accordance with the Fair Housing Act, Title VIII of the 1968 Civil Rights Act.

The lawsuit was backed by Shurat HaDin-Israel Law Center.

The plaintiffs are represented by New York attorney Robert Tolchin, Shurat HaDin director Nitsana Darshan-Leitner and Delaware lawyer David Eagle.

“Airbnb’s new discriminatory policy has made it the poster child for the racist BDS movement,” said Darshan-Leitner. “These Jewish American property owners were shocked by Airbnb’s blacklisting of their homes and intend to legally fight this new hateful policy.”

“For centuries, anti-Semites have sought to dictate where Jews can live, where they can travel and what businesses they are permitted to engage in,” she continued. “Airbnb’s redlining policy is illegal and discriminates against these families based solely upon their religion.”

“Imagine if Airbnb decided not to service Muslim homes in Oakland because they opposed growth of the Muslim community there. Nobody would tolerate that for a minute,” said Tolchin. “Yet that is exactly what Airbnb’s policy is for Jews in the Judea and Samaria region. As a provider of a service to the public, Airbnb is not permitted to refuse to provide services to selected religious group to engineer who it thinks should be allowed to live where.”

In a statement, Airbnb said: “Major U.S.-based multinational hotels do not offer accommodations in these settlements and under our policy, listings in Israeli settlements in the West Bank will no longer be active.”

“We don’t believe this lawsuit will succeed in court, but we know that people will disagree with our decision and appreciate their perspective,” they added. “Israel is a special place with special people, and we are honored to have more than 20,000 hosts in Israel who welcome visitors from all over the world and continue to do all we can to support people to people travel.”

Airbnb mentioned that “our announcement applies only to the approximately 200 Airbnb listings in Israeli settlements in the West Bank and not to other areas, including East Jerusalem and Golan Heights.”

Mort Klein, national president of the Zionist Organization of America, told JNS that “ZOA hopes that this and other lawsuits being brought against Airbnb—and the phone calls and emails from ZOA and all our friends—will persuade Airbnb to end its outrageous, unlawful, anti-Semitic, discriminatory policy of blacklisting Jewish homes in Judea/Samaria.”

In Jerusalem District Court last week, a group of Jewish residents from Judea and Samaria filed a class-action lawsuit against Airbnb.

“He was smiling. He has a winning demeanor, but I don’t expect to see any changes,” Rabbi Gerald Sussman, of Temple Emanu-El of Staten Island, told JNS.
Gov. Mikie Sherrill says fewer than 400 of those improperly registered cast ballots as the White House renews its push for proof-of-citizenship voting legislation.
David Blomstrom, who is running for Congress, states that “people called me an ‘antisemite,’ whatever that is” and that “I am more staunchly pro-Iran and anti-Israel than either of my two opponents.”
The Ohio chapter aims to combat Jew-hatred through education and dialogue, with organizers hoping it will serve as a model for other colleges.
A unanimous Second Circuit panel ruled that Mohsen Mahdawi’s challenge to his detention and removal must proceed through the immigration system, vacating a lower court order that had secured his release.
The deal builds on the two countries’ existing free trade pact while expanding market access for U.S. exporters and deepening economic and security cooperation.