(May 6, 2020 / JNS) U.S. President Donald Trump announced on Wednesday that he vetoed a congressional resolution to curb his ability to enact future U.S. military action against Iran without congressional approval.
“This was a very insulting resolution, introduced by Democrats as part of a strategy to win an election on November 3 by dividing the Republican Party,” said Trump in a statement released by the White House. “The few Republicans who voted for it played right into their hands.”
In the Senate, Sens. Rand Paul (R-Ky.), Mike Lee (R-Utah), Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska), Todd Young (R-Ind.), Lamar Alexander (R-Tenn.), Jerry Moran (R-Kan.), Susan Collins (R-Maine) and Bill Cassidy (R-La.) were the Republicans who voted in favor of the measure, while Reps. Ken Buck (R-Colo.), Morgan Griffith (R-Va.) Thomas Massie (R-Ky.), Tom Reed (R-N.Y.), David Schweikert (R-Ariz.) and Fred Upton (R-Mich.) were the Republicans to do so in the U.S. House of Representatives.
“In addition, S.J. Res. 68 is based on misunderstandings of facts and law. Contrary to the resolution, the United States is not engaged in the use of force against Iran,” stated Trump. “Four months ago, I took decisive action to eliminate Qassem Soleimani while he was in Iraq. Iran responded by launching a series of missiles at our forces stationed in Iraq. No one was killed by these attacks.”
Although no one was killed in the Jan. 8 ballistic-missile attacks at the Ain Al-Asad air base, about 110 U.S. service members were reportedly diagnosed with traumatic brain injuries following the attack. The Irbil air base, which also houses U.S. troops, was also targeted by ballistic missiles. Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps took responsibility for the attacks.
“Further, the strike against Soleimani was fully authorized by law, including by the Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq Resolution of 2002 and Article II of the Constitution,” said Trump in the White House statement regarding the veto.
The introduction of the resolution came in the aftermath of the Soleimani elimination on Jan. 3.
Finally, said Trump, the resolution “would have greatly harmed the president’s ability to protect the United States, its allies and its partners.”
“The resolution implies that the president’s constitutional authority to use military force is limited to defense of the United States and its forces against imminent attack. That is incorrect. We live in a hostile world of evolving threats, and the Constitution recognizes that the president must be able to anticipate our adversaries’ next moves, and take swift and decisive action in response. That’s what I did! Congress should not have passed this resolution.”
Support Jewish Journalism
with 2020 Vision
One of the most intriguing stories of the sudden Coronavirus crisis is the role of the internet. With individuals forced into home quarantine, most are turning further online for information, education and social interaction.
JNS's influence and readership are growing exponentially, and our positioning sets us apart. Most Jewish media are advocating increasingly biased progressive political and social agendas. JNS is providing more and more readers with a welcome alternative and an ideological home.
During this crisis, JNS continues working overtime. We are being relied upon to tell the story of this crisis as it affects Israel and the global Jewish community, and explain the extraordinary political developments taking place in parallel.
Our ability to thrive in 2020 and beyond depends on the generosity of committed readers and supporters. Monthly donations in particular go a long way in helping us sustain our operations. We greatly appreciate any contributions you can make during these challenging times. We thank you for your ongoing support and wish you blessings for good health and peace of mind.