Newsletter
Newsletter Support JNS

House of Representatives rejects move to cut foreign aid, exempting Israel

Reps. Glenn Grothman (R-Wis.) and Rick Allen (R-Ga.) each introduced an amendment to cut 2.1 percent and 1 percent, respectively, of the State and Foreign Operations budget across the board.

U.S. House of Representatives
U.S. House of Representatives building and the East Portico of the U.S. Capitol. Photo Photo by Ron Cogswell.

The U.S. House of Representatives rejected two amendments on Tuesday evening that apparently would have cut foreign aid except to Israel, despite the American Israel Public Affairs Committee’s claim that stated otherwise.

Reps. Glenn Grothman (R-Wis.) and Rick Allen (R-Ga.) each introduced an amendment to cut 2.1 percent and 1 percent, respectively, of the State and Foreign Operations budget across the board.

“Just now, the House of Representatives voted to oppose two amendments that would have cut the foreign aid budget and security assistance to Israel. We appreciate the members who stood in support of this cost-effective investment that promotes U.S. interests,” tweeted AIPAC.

Just now, the House of Representatives voted to oppose two amendments that would have cut the foreign aid budget and security assistance to Israel. We appreciate the members who stood in support of this cost-effective investment that promotes U.S. interests. — AIPAC (@AIPAC) June 19, 2019

Grothman told JNS on Wednesday that his and Allen’s amendment would not have touched the $3.3 billion in annual U.S. assistance to Israel.

His office explained that “his amendment was a decrease in the increase to the top-line number. The reason why this is the most important sentence is that it means his amendment had nothing to do with the $3.3 billion allocated to Israel. Whether the amendment was adopted or not, as it wasn’t, Israel still would still receive $3.3 billion in aid should this bill be signed into law, which the Congressman supports.”

Grothman also mentioned his intent to contact AIPAC to clarify in response to the pro-Israel lobby’s tweet.

AIPAC told JNS, “Our understanding is that the language of this amendment would not have excluded those funds.”

Allen did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Allen, along with Rep. Ted Lieu (D-Calif.), introduced a resolution in April reaffirming the importance of America’s economic relationship with Israel. The resolution highlights the many ways that U.S.-Israel economic cooperation has benefited both countries, including encouraging technological innovation and scientific advancement.

“Israel has been one of our most beloved allies, and we must continue to stand in solidarity with this beacon of democracy,” said Allen at the time. “I look forward to advancing our mutually beneficial friendship and partnership with Israel for years to come.”

“I have long opposed amendments that indiscriminately apply an across the board cut to the carefully thought out funding recommendations in each appropriations bill [which] make no provision for protecting high priority programs … such as security assistance to Israel,” said Rep. Nita Lowey (D-N.Y.), who chairs the House Appropriations Committee.

Investigators said Ndiaga Diagne acted alone and found no evidence of association with a foreign terrorist organization in the attack that killed three and wounded 15 outside a downtown bar.
“Today we’ve seen the defendant held fully accountable and fully responsible for the horrific hate crime that he committed and the act of antisemitism he committed after planning it out and taking methodical and intentional steps to harm as many people in the Jewish community as he possibly could,” said Michael Dougherty, Boulder County district attorney.
Rami Elghandour has accused the public school of ignoring free speech and of “virtue-signaling.”
“Almost a year ago, on June 1, 2025, there was a heinous antisemitic attack on 29 members of the Boulder community during a peaceful gathering in front of the Boulder County Courthouse,” the county said.
“In this country, public art doesn’t become off-limits just because it may make some people think about religion,” Joseph Davis, an attorney representing the city, told the court.
“There is no tolerance for hatred of Jewish New Yorkers, which we have seen time and time again, whether it be in the graffitiing of swastikas on a number of homes across Queens recently,” the New York City mayor said.