Newsletter
Newsletter Support JNS

Israel’s most difficult gamble: Hope amid terror

In his meeting with Trump, Netanyahu embraced compromise not as weakness but as the virtue of the strong.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his delegation meet with US President Donald Trump and his team at the White House, Sept. 29, 2025. Photo by Avi Ohayon/GPO.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his delegation meet with US President Donald Trump and his team at the White House, Sept. 29, 2025. Photo by Avi Ohayon/GPO.
Fiamma Nirenstein is an Italian-Israeli journalist, author and senior research fellow at the Jerusalem Center for Security and Foreign Affairs (JCFA). An adviser on antisemitism to Israel’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs, she served in the Italian Parliament (2008-2013) as vice president of the Foreign Affairs Committee. A founding member of the Friends of Israel Initiative, she has written 15 books, including October 7, Antisemitism and the War on the West, and is a leading voice on Israel, the Middle East, Europe and the fight against antisemitism.

Now is the time of hope. With American support, Israel has accepted the most difficult gamble: to risk its security, its current government and even its very identity as the unbeatable Jewish state, to test the possibility of an end to the Gaza war after almost two years.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, with extraordinary courage, has staked his place in history. Like his soldiers, whom he praised for their heroism, he now fights on another battlefield—one of diplomacy, compromise and unrelenting danger.

The test is immediate and severe. Within 72 hours, Hamas must return all hostages, alive and dead. Only then will it become clear whether the terrorist group truly accepts U.S. President Donald Trump’s 20-point plan. If Hamas betrays it, Netanyahu has promised to finish the job and destroy its power once and for all.

The plan is as ambitious as it is perilous: Israel has agreed to a three-phase withdrawal, to hand Gaza over to a mixed international authority led by the United States but with Arab nations at the center—once Hamas is dismantled.

It requires Hamas to surrender its strategic weapons, the missiles and explosives with which it has tormented Israel for years. And it forces painful concessions, including the release of prisoners who have committed horrific crimes.

Notably, the word “annexation” has disappeared from the table. Israel has set it aside, at least for now. The focus is elsewhere: on saving lives, on securing its southern communities, on ensuring that never again will Hamas terrorize Israeli families living near the Gaza border.

Trump, meanwhile, has pushed hard on both Hamas and the Arab world, offering to expand the Abraham Accords and again raising the prospect of a Palestinian state. On that point, Netanyahu is firm: only after a long, serious process of de-radicalization can such an idea even be considered.

For Israel, this is a leap into the unknown. The challenge is immense: to reach an accord with those who still preach jihadist ideology, without surrendering or backtracking, but while keeping open a path toward peace.

Words have filled the air for years. Now, what matters are deeds: the release of the hostages, a verifiable withdrawal that leaves strong security zones, Hamas handing over its weapons and the stance of the Arab states.

Netanyahu has embraced compromise not as weakness but as the virtue of the strong. If the hostages come home, they will open the road to history. If Hamas truly yields, it will mark an unprecedented victory not only for Israel but for the free world.

The joint strength of Israel and the United States may—just may—make the impossible possible.

Israel Airports Authority confirmed that the planes were empty and no injuries were reported.

The victims suffered light blast wounds and were listed in good condition at Beilinson Hospital.
The IDF said that the the Al-Amana Fuel Company sites generate millions of dollars a year for the Iranian-backed terror group.
A U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission fact sheet says that the two countries are working to “undermine the U.S.-led global order.”
“Opining on world affairs is not the job of a teachers’ union,” said Mika Hackner, director of research at the North American Values Institute.

“We’re launching a campaign to show the difference in the attitude towards Israel and towards Iran,” Daniel Meron, the Israeli ambassador to the United Nations in Geneva, told JNS.