Newsletter
Newsletter Support JNS

High Court reconvenes to hear petition against Gantz-Netanyahu unity deal

The court is being asked to decide whether or not a prime minister under indictment should be permitted to form a government.

Israeli Supreme Court Chief Justice Esther Hayut at the Supreme Court in Jerusalem on May 3, 2020. Photo by Oren Ben Hakoon/POOL.
Israeli Supreme Court Chief Justice Esther Hayut at the Supreme Court in Jerusalem on May 3, 2020. Photo by Oren Ben Hakoon/POOL.

Israel’s High Court of Justice convened for a second consecutive day of hearings on Monday, this time to determine the legality of the coalition agreement reached two weeks ago between Likud Party leader Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Benny Gantz, head of the Blue and White Party.

During the hearing, Chief Justice Esther Hayut took issue with clauses of the coalition agreement, such as its prohibition on making senior appointments, including that of police chief, during the “national emergency” period declared due to the coronavirus pandemic.

During Sunday’s seven-hour session, the unusually large panel of 11 judges heard petitions seeking to bar Netanyahu from forming and heading the next government while under indictment. While Israeli law bars ministers from continuing to serve if indicted, a prime minister may remain in power even after being convicted, and until the appeals process is exhausted.

However, the court is now being asked to decide whether that means that a prime minister under indictment should be permitted to form a government.

In an opinion submitted to the High Court last Thursday, Israeli Attorney General Avichai Mandelblit said that there was no legal obstacle to Netanyahu forming of a government, or to the Likud-Blue and White coalition deal, despite what he said were “significant” problems raised by the latter, while on Sunday the petitioners against the prime minister appeared unable to provide arguments that satisfied the judges.

At one point in the proceedings, Hayut lost her patience, admonishing the attorney for the petitioners to “show us something—a law or a verdict from Israel or elsewhere” to justify the petitioners’ demand that the court overrule the Knesset, which reflects the will of the electorate.

“You want us to rule based on your personal opinion?” she asked.

The court is expected to issue its final verdict on both matters by the end of the week. In the event that it rules in favor of the petitioners, Israelis will be forced into its fourth round of elections in 18 months.

U.S. Central Command stated that the “precision strike” targeting Ali Husayn al-Ulaywi was part of ongoing efforts to eliminate terrorists threatening Americans and U.S. allies.
“Wikipedia’s administrators showed that they are above trivial details like formal charges, a designated prosecutor, basic decorum, distinction between prosecution and judge, dispassionate adjudication and so forth,” Larry Sanger told JNS.
“We want to hear from our partners. We want to make sure that their views are taken into account,” the U.S. secretary of state told reporters at Al Bateen Executive Airport in Abu Dhabi.
The decision follows a U.N.-commissioned investigation into allegations of sexual misconduct and comes ahead of a July 24 vote by ICC member states on whether to remove Khan from office.
“It’s difficult to stand among ancient stones and not recognize the power of a people maintaining a connection to places that have shaped their story for thousands of years,” said one participant.
Panelists at JNS Summit call for a strong response to international legal challenges facing Israel.
Benny Gantz, JNS editor-in-chief Jonathan S. Tobin, Gilad Erdan, Mosab Hassan Yousef, Nissim Black and leading voices in security, diplomacy, media, law and Jewish communal affairs headline the summit’s third day in Jerusalem.