Newsletter
Newsletter Support JNS

High Court reconvenes to hear petition against Gantz-Netanyahu unity deal

The court is being asked to decide whether or not a prime minister under indictment should be permitted to form a government.

Israeli Supreme Court Chief Justice Esther Hayut at the Supreme Court in Jerusalem on May 3, 2020. Photo by Oren Ben Hakoon/POOL.
Israeli Supreme Court Chief Justice Esther Hayut at the Supreme Court in Jerusalem on May 3, 2020. Photo by Oren Ben Hakoon/POOL.

Israel’s High Court of Justice convened for a second consecutive day of hearings on Monday, this time to determine the legality of the coalition agreement reached two weeks ago between Likud Party leader Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Benny Gantz, head of the Blue and White Party.

During the hearing, Chief Justice Esther Hayut took issue with clauses of the coalition agreement, such as its prohibition on making senior appointments, including that of police chief, during the “national emergency” period declared due to the coronavirus pandemic.

During Sunday’s seven-hour session, the unusually large panel of 11 judges heard petitions seeking to bar Netanyahu from forming and heading the next government while under indictment. While Israeli law bars ministers from continuing to serve if indicted, a prime minister may remain in power even after being convicted, and until the appeals process is exhausted.

However, the court is now being asked to decide whether that means that a prime minister under indictment should be permitted to form a government.

In an opinion submitted to the High Court last Thursday, Israeli Attorney General Avichai Mandelblit said that there was no legal obstacle to Netanyahu forming of a government, or to the Likud-Blue and White coalition deal, despite what he said were “significant” problems raised by the latter, while on Sunday the petitioners against the prime minister appeared unable to provide arguments that satisfied the judges.

At one point in the proceedings, Hayut lost her patience, admonishing the attorney for the petitioners to “show us something—a law or a verdict from Israel or elsewhere” to justify the petitioners’ demand that the court overrule the Knesset, which reflects the will of the electorate.

“You want us to rule based on your personal opinion?” she asked.

The court is expected to issue its final verdict on both matters by the end of the week. In the event that it rules in favor of the petitioners, Israelis will be forced into its fourth round of elections in 18 months.

Speaking to local authority leaders, the Israeli premier said bold military decisions changed the regional balance of power and averted existential threats.
“Here is one more institution of government in Canada, one of our six national museums, again failing the Jewish community, leading to a rupture in the Jewish community,” Mark Berlin told JNS.
Peter James Bloomfield allegedly wrote online threats to kill FBI agents and “blow up the White House,” while investigators say he also made antisemitic threats in his posts.
Tarek Bazrouk was sentenced to 17 months in prison in October 2025 after attacking three Jewish individuals at different pro-Israel demonstrations in New York.
The Center for Strategic and International Studies’ estimate of between $34 to $42 billion closely matched the results of a separate study by the American Enterprise Institute.
“I will be one of the Jewish members of Congress most willing to stand up for Palestinian human rights,” he told the crowd at his victory party in Brooklyn.
Benny Gantz, JNS editor-in-chief Jonathan S. Tobin, Gilad Erdan, Mosab Hassan Yousef, Nissim Black and leading voices in security, diplomacy, media, law and Jewish communal affairs headline the summit’s third day in Jerusalem.