Newsletter
Newsletter Support JNS

Coast Guard backtracks on policy change calling swastikas, nooses ‘potentially divisive’

“These are quintessential symbols of hate, not merely ‘divisive symbols,’ nor abstract icons,” wrote the co-chairs of the House Bipartisan Task Force for Combating Antisemitism.

JNS logo

Following fierce backlash, the U.S. Coast Guard has reversed course on enacting a new harassment policy designating swastikas and nooses as “potentially divisive.”

The change came hours after questions emerged from a Washington Post report on Nov. 20 about the policy, completed under Adm. Kevin Lunday, acting commandant of the branch, that reclassified and downgraded the symbols.

The updated memo outlining the new policy now prohibits the displays of swastikas, nooses and “any symbols or flags co-opted or adopted by hate-based groups as representations of supremacy, racial or religious intolerance, antisemitism or any other improper bias.”

It classifies such symbols as “divisive or hate symbols.”

“These are quintessential symbols of hate, not merely ‘divisive symbols,’ nor abstract icons,” read a bipartisan statement from the co-chairs of the House Bipartisan Task Force for Combating Antisemitism.

“By eliminating the terminology of ‘hate incident’ symbols at a time of rising antisemitism and increasing hate, the Coast Guard risks emboldening those who seek to intimidate or target Jewish Americans, black Americans and other minority communities,” it stated.

The co-chairs added that the change would send “a chilling signal to American Jews at a moment when antisemitic incidents have already hit record highs in the United States.”

The Coast Guard falls under the jurisdiction of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, which initially denied the Post report’s claim that any policy change had been made. Coast Guard officials then stated that the service would be “reviewing the language” of the policy.

Mike Wagenheim is a Washington-based correspondent for JNS, primarily covering the U.S. State Department and Congress. He is the senior U.S. correspondent at the Israel-based i24NEWS TV network.
The attacks, which followed drone strikes and shelling by the terrorists, came after Israel’s targeted killing of a senior commander in Beirut.
The U.S. president says Tehran must quickly accept terms on uranium and Hormuz shipping after Iranian forces fires on American destroyers.
The findings could also point to the presence of these metals in smaller fish species commonly consumed by humans.
The P.A. officer allegedly planned to carry out an attack.
Lebanese officials are expected to press demands on IDF withdrawal, prisoners and reconstruction as negotiations move beyond the ambassadorial level for the first time.
Had Trump allowed Israel one final operation in Iran, the IDF would have chosen to destroy the uranium. The Mossad would have chosen an all-out effort to get Iranians to overthrow the mullahs.