Newsletter
Newsletter Support JNS

White House antisemitism strategy reportedly to mix IHRA, progressive definition

A definition that suggests it isn’t necessarily antisemitic to apply double standards to Israel is part of the current plan, according to a news report.

White House
The White House in Washington, D.C. Photo by Menachem Wecker.

U.S. President Joe Biden and his administration have long touted their forthcoming strategy to combat antisemitism. In fact, Biden said recently that the plan will include “over 100 meaningful actions that government agencies are going to take to counter antisemitism.”

But according to Jewish Insider reporting, citing anonymous sources, the plan in its current form draws upon both the widely accepted International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance’s (IHRA) working definition as well as the more progressive Nexus definition of antisemitism.

“Mainstream Jewish groups are lobbying the Biden administration to include only the IHRA definition, and some left-wing groups—which argue that the IHRA definition is overbroad in characterizing some critiques of Israel as antisemitic—seek to either exclude IHRA or reference other definitions alongside it,” the Jewish outlet reported. “Officials had also considered not mentioning any of the definitions, sources said.”

The White House’s draft plan currently highlights the IHRA definition, while the other definition, Nexus, is a “resource,” the unnamed source told Jewish Insider.

“Paying disproportionate attention to Israel and treating Israel differently than other countries is not prima facie proof of antisemitism,” according to the Nexus definition.

The Islamic Republic forced Washington to “retreat both on the battlefield and at the negotiating table,” said Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf.
The Iran-U.S. Memorandum of Understanding underscored Tehran’s ongoing support for the terror group, Abbas Araghchi told Basem Naim.
The launch pads were established under the cover of the ceasefire with Hamas, according to the Israeli military.
An all-women panel at the JNS International Policy Summit highlighted the voices of ordinary Iranians.
Ilana Gritzewsky, a former Hamas captive, told the U.N. Human Rights Council she is “living proof” of sexual violence, challenging rapporteur Reem Alsalem.
“There is an understanding here that Israel has a problem with Hezbollah and that something needs to be done about it,” said the Dutch defense chief.
Benny Gantz, JNS editor-in-chief Jonathan S. Tobin, Gilad Erdan, Mosab Hassan Yousef, Nissim Black and leading voices in security, diplomacy, media, law and Jewish communal affairs headline the summit’s third day in Jerusalem.