Campus Antisemitism
The Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression accused the school of cherry-picking and “needlessly” maligning the character of the student.
“Fighting antisemitism means we must understand it,” Rep. Tim Walberg said at the March on Washington for Jewish Civil Rights.
“Given the circumstances and today’s conversations,” university president James Ryan wrote that he could leave effective immediately but “no later than Aug. 15, 2025.”
“We must distinguish between protected speech and conduct that violates civil rights,” the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights stated.
“The committee must understand not only whether there was a hostile environment,” the letters stated, “but whether the college adequately responded to incidents.”
MIT “has failed to acknowledge that it has a real antisemitism problem or take appropriate actions that deal with it,” a Brandeis Center lawyer told JNS.
“This is a terrible error in judgment on the part of the governor,” said Tom Horne. “This bill should have been signed into law.”
The Chabad House on campus sued the city of Cambridge for denying its request to connect its buildings.
A new survey that documents Jew-hatred at Columbia University is “difficult to read,” according to Claire Shipman, the school’s acting president.
“It is highly unusual to be seeking detention of a petitioner given the factual record of today,” U.S. District Court Judge Michael Farbiarz stated.
The Republican congressmen are urging the school to choose a candidate who will “continue standing for what’s right—especially in the wake of a terrifying rise of antisemitic rhetoric on college campuses.”
“The word you are looking for is ‘Israeli,’” stated David Jacobs, a member of the public school’s governing council.
