Newsletter
Newsletter Support JNS

Why Israel shouldn’t heed the ICJ’s immoral genocide ruling

The Caroline Glick Show “In-Focus.”

The International Court of Justice, an arm of the United Nations, put forth an interim ruling on Jan. 26 that doesn’t say whether or not Israel is committing genocide and doesn’t call for a ceasefire in the war against Hamas. So is it a win or loss for Israel? Should Israel abide by the court’s demands? If the court has no way to enforce its ruling, then what’s really going on here? Watch Caroline Glick’s “In-Focus” to find out.

Caroline B. Glick is the international affairs advisor to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.
“No more weapons to support an illegal war,” Sanders wrote on Thursday, setting up a vote that will largely gauge Democratic support for Israel.
“We are deeply grateful for speaker Julie Menin’s leadership, her presence and for standing up against antisemitism when it truly matters,” David Greenfield, CEO of the Met Council, told JNS.
“Obviously, our number one effort is geared towards Iran, but if the regime goes, you know that Hezbollah goes,” the Israeli prime minister told JNS at a live press conference in Jerusalem.
The website also offers guidance for faith organizations seeking grants from the federal agency.
Nathan Diament, of the Orthodox Union, told JNS that the statement “could not come at a more important time with bad actors weaponizing Catholicism to spread antisemitic views.”
“What happened at Berkeley is a cautionary tale,” stated Kenneth Marcus, of the Brandeis Center, after the public school settled a lawsuit alleging Jew-hatred.