Newsletter
Newsletter Support JNS

Bill seeks to bar courts from recognizing foreign, religious laws conflicting with US Constitution

The measure cites concerns over due process, equal protection and practices the sponsors say are incompatible with American legal standards.

A judge signing a document in a courtroom setting. Credit: Katrin Bolovtsova/Pexels.
A judge signing a document in a courtroom setting. Credit: Katrin Bolovtsova/Pexels.

Rep. Keith Self (R-Texas) and members of the House Sharia-Free America Caucus unveiled on Wednesday the Preserving Our Constitution Act of 2026, which would bar federal courts from recognizing or enforcing foreign or religious law when it conflicts with rights protected by the U.S. Constitution.

The bill would prohibit federal courts from recognizing foreign judgments based on legal systems deemed “incompatible” with constitutional protections and would prevent judges from dismissing cases in favor of foreign courts that do not afford litigants due process and equal protection.

Under the legislation, incompatible legal systems are those that permit practices such as discrimination based on sex or religion, forced or child marriage, female genital mutilation, polygamy, religiously motivated violence and punishments barred by the Eighth Amendment.

A spokesperson for Self said the measure is closely modeled on the American Laws for American Courts Act, drafted principally by David Yerushalmi, an Orthodox Jewish attorney and co-founder of the American Freedom Law Center. Similar laws have been enacted in Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, Florida, Kansas, Louisiana, Mississippi and North Carolina.

The announcement came two days after the caucus, founded by Self and Rep. Chip Roy (R-Texas), stated that its membership had grown to 68 lawmakers from 25 states.

Jessica Russak-Hoffman is a reporter for JNS in Seattle.
The trial stop in the Buckeye State would help those who require consular help but don’t want to or can’t travel to New York.
No injuries were reported. Separately, Israeli soldiers shot dead two terrorists who posed a threat.
“Vandalizing the World War II Memorial is an outrageous insult to all who served and Holocaust survivors, as well as all Americans and the values for which our country stands,” Sara J. Bloomfield, director of the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum, told JNS.
“We will keep litigating until we get to the truth,” Randy Mastro told JNS, after oral arguments in New York County Supreme Court. “I’m sure the court will hear us when these procedural issues are behind us.”