Newsletter
Newsletter Support JNS

Kushner: Mideast peace plan to seek ‘tough compromises’ from Israelis, Palestinians

White House senior adviser Jared Kushner said the strategy focuses on “how do we make life for Palestinians better?” and “how do we make Israel safer?”

Jared Kushner, White House senior adviser and son-in-law of U.S. President Donald Trump, speaking at the 2019 TIME 100 Summit on April 23, 2019. Credit: Screenshot.
Jared Kushner, White House senior adviser and son-in-law of U.S. President Donald Trump, speaking at the 2019 TIME 100 Summit on April 23, 2019. Credit: Screenshot.

White House senior adviser Jared Kushner said on Tuesday that the highly anticipated so-called “deal of the century” will “demand tough compromises from Israelis and Palestinians.”

“Normally they start with a process … what we’ve done is the opposite,” said Kushner, also U.S. President Donald Trump’s son-in-law, at the annual TIME 100 Summit in New York.

“The two-state solution failed,” he said. “New and different ways to reach peace must be tried.”

Kushner remarked that the strategy focuses on “how do we make life for Palestinians better?” and “how do we make Israel safer?”

He also confirmed reports that the proposal will not be released will be released after Israel forms a new government and after the Islamic holiday of Ramadan, which starts on May 5 and concludes on June 4.

In its own version of the Palestinian “pay-for-slay” scheme, the terror group has leveraged state institutions to channel public funds.
IDF reservists’ rights, highway safety among the causes championed by the Likud legislator.
“The strikes are designed to further degrade Iranian military capabilities used to attack commercial shipping in the Strait of Hormuz,” CENTCOM stated.
“They see Jews as oppressors,” Doug Basler told JNS, accusing Kshama Sawant and another Democratic challenger of viewing Israel through a Marxist lens.
“I don’t think many people have, aside from a very small number,” Abbas Araghchi said.
The Wexner Foundation ended its relationship with Harvard over what it called the “dismal failure of Harvard’s leadership to take a clear and unequivocal stand” after Oct. 7.