Newsletter
Newsletter Support JNS

Most US voters oppose military action against Iran, per Quinnipiac poll

The survey found declining support for the conflict and widespread skepticism that President Donald Trump’s negotiators can bring it to an end.

American Flag
American flag. Credit: oohhsnapp/Pixabay.

Six in 10 U.S. voters oppose the ongoing U.S. military action against Iran, with opposition reaching its highest level since the conflict began, according to a Quinnipiac University poll released on Wednesday.

The poll, conducted July 23-27 among 963 registered voters, found that 60% of voters oppose the war, while 34% support it, marking the lowest level of support in Quinnipiac polling. Opposition includes nearly one in five Republicans and nearly seven in 10 independents.

Voters also overwhelmingly rejected a potential ground deployment, with 74% opposing sending U.S. troops into Iran and 19% supporting such a move.

More than half of voters (55%) said they expect the conflict to last at least a year, a sharp increase from April, when 32% predicted the fighting would continue that long.

A majority of voters (54%) said they do not believe the United States is winning the conflict, while 66% said the military action was not worth fighting.

Voters also expressed doubts about U.S. President Donald Trump’s diplomatic team. Fifty-seven percent said they had little or no confidence in Jared Kushner and Steve Witkoff’s ability to bring the conflict to an end, while 39% expressed some or a lot of confidence.

“After months of rising and falling hopes, punctuated by deadly military exchanges, voters wonder whether Kushner and Witkoff have the diplomatic chops to close the deal,” Quinnipiac polling analyst Tim Malloy stated.

Trump’s overall job approval rating fell to 32%, his lowest mark in Quinnipiac polling, while 58% disapproved of his performance. The rating was down from 38% approval in June, though the change remains within the poll’s margin of error of 4.1 percentage points.

“Neo-Nazi propaganda and the organizations that spread it should have no place in our Orange County,” Joey Good of the Jewish Federation of Orange County told JNS.
“They do nothing,” a state lawmaker said, of the committee, which has had a problem with antisemitic statements from members. “That doesn’t mean they can’t use the bully pulpit and try to shame people.”
“The ruling rightly validates the state’s authority to direct resources toward protecting the Jewish community without it being considered discriminatory against other groups,” Carly Gammill of StandWithUs told JNS.
“Regardless of the intent to either fight overseas or plot an attack on our soil, we will tenaciously investigate and arrest anyone supporting and conspiring with terrorists,” the FBI special agent in charge in Newark said.
The New York City mayor said he was unaware the committee included no Jewish lawyers and denied that religion played any role in selecting its members.
“An attack motivated by hate against one community is an attack against us all,” Kathryn Barger said as officials respond to antisemitic graffiti targeting the Pasadena Jewish Temple and Center.