Newsletter
Newsletter Support JNS

Iran is desperate to keep the nuclear deal

Right now, it looks like the only party focused on nuclear nonproliferation is the Trump administration, while the others are cynically brushing nuclear dangers to the sidelines in favor of economic gain.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu exposes files smuggled out of Iran which Israel claims detail the Islamic Republic's illicit military nuclear program, April 30, 2018. Credit: Amos Ben-Gershom/GPO.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu exposes files smuggled out of Iran which Israel claims detail the Islamic Republic’s illicit military nuclear program, April 30, 2018. Credit: Amos Ben-Gershom/GPO.

The next chapter in the Iran nuclear saga, after U.S. President Donald Trump’s withdrawal from the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action will depend on the decisions made by the parties that agreed to the deal. At present, it is clear that Iran desperately wants to keep the deal—not a surprise taking into account that the JCPOA has major benefits for it, while requiring only minimal nuclear concessions—and the European states would like to go along, as would the Russians and Chinese.

The Europeans are focused more on business opportunities than nonproliferation and want the United States to allow them to move forward with economic deals with Iran. But this is at direct odds with the aim of President Trump—namely, to implement the harshest sanctions on Iran, with the hope that renewed severe economic pressure will help in ultimately renegotiating a better nuclear deal.

There is one significant piece missing from the puzzle of the past months, and that is what transpired between Americans and the Europeans in their attempts to come to agreement on strengthening the deal. How committed were the parties to this effort? The Europeans only grudgingly agreed to enter discussions in February, after Trump threatened to leave the deal, and then complained they had done “everything possible” to answer Trump’s demands but he remained set on withdrawing.

Is that true?

Were the parties close to agreement? What was the content of their “fix”? And what were the remaining sticking points? Unfortunately, the answers are not available. If there’s any hope of getting a better deal—either strengthened or renegotiated—the answers to these questions are crucial and should be public knowledge.

Right now, it looks like the only party that is focused on nuclear nonproliferation is the Trump administration, while the others are cynically brushing nuclear dangers to the sidelines in favor of economic gain.

Emily B. Landau is a senior research fellow, head of the Arms Control and Regional Security Program, Institute for National Security Studies (INSS), Tel Aviv.

Published as part of an article by Dr. George N. Tzogopoulos for BESA Center.

“Upholding the integrity of our elections, and the right of American citizens to determine the outcome, is non-negotiable,” stated David Metcalf, U.S. attorney for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. “Our democracy depends on it.”
PM says the IDF will apply its “aggressive” refugee-camp model in Hebron, evacuating residents and conducting house-to-house searches.
The Israeli premier said Trump also views toppling Tehran’s leadership as the only way to end the nuclear threat.
“Our mission and strategy remain the same,” AIPAC spokeswoman Deryn Sousa told JNS.