Newsletter
Newsletter Support JNS

Poll findings show students believe UCLA prioritized free speech over safety

A report from the school’s antisemitism task force has prompted pushback.

UCLA
The University of California, Los Angeles. Credit: ACasualPenguin/Pixabay.

The University of California-Los Angeles has come under fire following the published findings of a study in response to anti-Israel protests, tent encampments and violence that roiled the campus this spring.

The Wall Street Journal reported on Oct. 22 the results of a survey, undertaken by the antisemitism task force at UCLA, which found that of 428 students, a whopping 75% thought school administrators treated antisemitism as less serious than other forms of bigotry on campus.

Lisa Katz, government affairs officer of the Combat Antisemitism Movement, said the university’s choice “to prioritize free speech protections over addressing antisemitism on campus is utterly unacceptable. UCLA’s classification of the pro-Hamas encampment on campus as protected speech highlights the lack of clear guidelines distinguishing free speech from hate speech.”

Katz pointed out that “criminal assaults, vandalism, incitement to violence and other criminal behaviors are not protected speech and cannot hide behind First Amendment protections.”

She advocated for the school to adopt the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance’s (IHRA) working definition of antisemitism, in addition to doing more “to ensure that Jewish students are safe and protected on campus.”

A U.S. official said the blockade of Iranian ports would be lifted if Tehran and Muscat finalize an arrangement.
The cohort includes 392 new immigrants—246 men and 146 women.
World Vision was found to have provided funding to a U.S. sanctioned organization, and Israel jailed its Gaza operations manager for diverting as much as $50 million to Hamas.
Democratic state representative Roger Goodman, co-chair of the legislative Jewish caucus, told JNS that it could be a “misstep” for the public school to invite the “divisive” commentator.