Newsletter
Newsletter Support JNS

Report: Pompeo to argue US still part of Iran deal to extend UN arms embargo on Tehran

“We cannot allow the Islamic Republic to purchase conventional weapons in six months,” said the U.S. Secretary of State.

U.S. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo participates in a discussion with David Rubenstein at the Economic Club of Washington, D.C., on July 29, 2019. Credit: State Department Photo by Michael Gross/Public Domain.
U.S. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo participates in a discussion with David Rubenstein at the Economic Club of Washington, D.C., on July 29, 2019. Credit: State Department Photo by Michael Gross/Public Domain.

U.S. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo is expected to present a legal argument that the United States is still a “participant state” of the 2015 Iran nuclear deal, which the Trump administration withdrew from in May 2018 in an effort to extend the U.N. arms embargo on Tehran that is scheduled either to be lifted in the fall or to have even harsher sanctions imposed on the Islamic Republic, reported The New York Times over the weekend.

Since then, the United States has reimposed sanctions lifted under it, along with enacted new financial penalties against the regime.

The reported strategy would come as the United States has begun to make known a U.N. Security Council resolution to extend the 2010 arms embargo on Iran—a resolution that is all but guaranteed to fail as China and Russia would likely each exercise its permanent veto on the council. The Russians have already stated their intention of resuming the trade of arms to the Islamic regime.

Were such a resolution to fail, the United States is expected to unilaterally activate the snapback sanctions under the deal that would include restoring previous U.N. bans on Iran, which were lifted under the nuclear deal, including the arms embargo.

“We cannot allow the Islamic Republic of Iran to purchase conventional weapons in six months,” Pompeo told The New York Times in a statement. “President [Barack] Obama should never have agreed to end the U.N. arms embargo.”

He added that “we are prepared to exercise all of our diplomatic options to ensure the arms embargo stays in place at the U.N. Security Council.”

Richard Goldberg, who served in the Trump administration as the director for countering Iran’s weapons of mass destruction at the White House National Security Council, told JNS that the action Pompeo seeks to take at the United Nations is bigger than the nuclear deal itself.

“Secretary Pompeo has successfully reframed the issue at hand,” he said. “Snapback isn’t about ending the Iran nuclear deal per se; it’s about preventing Russia and China from destabilizing the Middle East and threatening broad Western security interests by supplying fighter jets, tanks and missile parts to the world’s leading state sponsor of terrorism.”

Goldberg continued, assuring that “the U.S. will now press for a vote inside the Security Council to extend the U.N. arms embargo on Iran and then, if Russia vetoes such an extension as promised, proceed to snapback hopefully with European support.”

A small business owner in the Big Apple told JNS that she is being hurt by tariffs more than by the credit rating.
Jay Greene, author of a new report on the subject, told JNS that the unions communicate in an “overwrought and extreme” way about Israel.
“Why are we to trust the U.N.’s own vetting procedures?” Adam Kaplan, of USAID, asked a congressional committee.
The pro-Israel group “has become increasingly problematic for many American Jews and for many candidates running for office,” Lauren Strauss, of American University, told JNS.
Sharon Liberman Mintz, of Jewish Theological Seminary, told JNS that the 1526 Haggadah “is one of the most exciting books that I have ever had the pleasure to turn the pages of.”
Tehran combines a narrative of victory with one of victimhood to shape public opinion. Israel is trying to catch up in the battle for public perception.