Newsletter
Newsletter Support JNS

Anti-Israel groups plan to rally against NYC ‘buffer zone’ legislation during vote

Activists planning the protest outside City Hall said that the measures are “anti-speech.”

NYPD
A New York City Police Department officer at a New York City Council meeting, March 18, 2026. Credit: Gerardo Romo/NYC Council Media Unit.

A coalition of anti-Israel activist groups plans to hold a rally and press conference on the steps of City Hall on March 26 to oppose proposed New York City legislation that would restrict protests near houses of worship.

The event comes as the City Council prepares to vote on Intro 1-B and Intro 175-B, measures that would establish “buffer zones” around houses of worship and educational facilities.

The rally is scheduled to take place during the vote, according to organizers—including the New York Civil Liberties Union, PAL-Awda NY and Jewish Voice for Peace NYC.

The groups claim the measures are “anti-speech” and would “prevent protests against the sale of stolen Palestinian land outside places of worship, or for divestment from from war profiteers outside educational facilities.”

“Note the lack of substance,” Mark Goldfeder, CEO and director of the National Jewish Advocacy Center, told JNS, of the claims.

He added that the groups host such rallies, “because they are paid to do so.”

“It’s really not about any of these issues,” Goldfeder told JNS. “These are wedge issues to destabilize.”

Abdulkadir Al-Jelani, 58, is due in court on July 1 and faces charges of making the threats and three counts of assault with a weapon.
The designations include Hezbollah-linked institutions that “threaten regional stability, international security, mutual interests and global trade,” the U.S. Treasury Department stated.
Gerard Filitti, of the Lawfare Project, told JNS that “lax immigration policy” has always been the main driver of importing “terrorist ideology” into the United States.
“The teachers we have, we don’t respect and support in the way that they deserve,” Paul Bernstein told JNS. “If we’re successful and we grow enrollment, that problem only gets bigger.”
“The message being sent is that you can get away with attacking someone in broad daylight because you disagree with their opinions, especially if it involves feelings about Israel,” Joshua Burt, of the Anti-Defamation League, told JNS.
“Not identifying Hamas as a terrorist organization is, I think, a failure, Marc Miller told the Canadian Press. “And not clearly stating that, for example, Hamas intended to kill Jews is, I think, an unfortunate error in curation and should be rectified.”