Newsletter
Newsletter Support JNS

UK court rejects bid to prosecute British-Israeli IDF reservist

The ruling comes amid British judiciary’s checkered record on anti-Israel lawfare and hooliganism, the group that defended the soldier said.

Demonstrators set up a banner as they protest outside Westminster Magistrates' Court in London, the U.K., on Oct. 27, 2025, where 28 alleged Palestine Action supporters are to appear in court. Photo by ADRIAN DENNIS/AFP via Getty Images.
Anti-Israel demonstrators set up a banner outside Westminster Magistrates’ Court in London, where 28 alleged Palestine Action supporters were to appear in court, on Oct. 27, 2025. Photo by Adrian Dennis/AFP via Getty Images.

A British court last week dismissed an attempt to privately prosecute a dual British-Israeli citizen for serving in an IDF reserve unit after 2023, and ordered the anti-Israel group that sued the defendant to pay his legal costs.

Paul Goldspring, chief magistrate of England and Wales, wrote in his ruling as a Westminster Magistrates’ Court judge that the International Centre of Justice for Palestinians (ICJP) had a “fundamentally flawed” interpretation of the law, and that ruling in favor of their lawsuit could have criminalized British Commonwealth citizens serving in the armed forces of countries such as India, Pakistan and Cyprus.

The ICJP relied on the Foreign Enlistment Act 1870 in alleging that the defendant had committed an offense by traveling to Israel on Oct. 8, 2023, to rejoin the IDF. The court rejected the argument, finding that the defendant was already an IDF reservist fulfilling an existing legal obligation under Israeli law rather than “enlisting” in a foreign military.

The ICJP committed “profound and serious breaches of the duty of candor,” the judge ruled, saying it failed to disclose longstanding U.K. government policy recognizing that dual nationals may serve in the armed forces of their other country of nationality.

Aurèle Tobelem, a trustee of UK Lawyers for Israel (UKLFI), a nongovernmental group that represented the defendant, called the ruling a “step in the right direction” but added that the British judiciary’s response to anti-Israel lawfare was still lacking.

“The British judiciary right now have the tools available to them,” Tobelem said, referring to legislation, “but should be much stricter with how they enforce the law against anti-Israel agitators and people who would wish to commit harmful acts upon Jews,” he told JNS.

A recent case that critics said eroded their trust in the British judiciary when handling anti-Israel militants was the acquittal in February of six anti-Israel activists of burglary even though they admitted to breaking into a factory belonging to Israel’s Elbit Systems defense manufacturer, where several police officers were assaulted.

In many cases, people who are targeted by anti-Israel lawfare in the U.K. cannot reasonably expect a just outcome today, Tobelem told JNS. “Not unless there are significant campaigns to raise awareness, not only about those who break the law, but what the law actually is.

“The greater the public outcry, the greater the incentive to actually rule in accordance with the law, which is unfortunately what’s going on right now. We have judiciaries that are taking an extremely lenient approach” to anti-Israel lawfare and hooliganism, Tobelem said.

Canaan Lidor is an experienced journalist and international correspondent for JNS, covering Europe, Australia and global Jewish affairs.
The terrorist was located near the site in Southern Lebanon’s Deir Siryan where Hazutt was killed and another IDF soldier wounded.
Tehran has concluded that pressure through the waterway can compel Washington to extract concessions from Israel, first in Lebanon and then across the region.
Zaher Brahim Khalil Abu Salem also attempted to carry out “numerous” attacks during the war.
In an increasingly challenging fundraising climate, Israeli companies developing long-term solutions can receive aid from the state.
Nabih Berri, an ally of Hezbollah, said his Amal movement would “confront” the deal in the Cabinet.
The terrorist organization’s decision to launch the Oct. 7 massacre was timed in part to thwart Saudi-Israeli normalization, say researchers.