Newsletter
Newsletter Support JNS

Poll: Only 23% of Americans comfortable discussing Israeli-Palestinian conflict without fear of reprimand

“Ideally, everyone should be comfortable expressing their opinions about key topics of debate, but most Americans don’t appear to feel that way,” said Nathan Honeycutt, polling manager for the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression.

American Jews, Israel, Flags, U.S.-Israel Relationship
American Jews and Israel. Credit: Kaboompics.com/Pexels.

Only 23% of Americans feel “very comfortable” sharing their views on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict “without fear of reprimand,” according to a survey released on Tuesday by the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression.

The quarterly National Speech Index, designed by FIRE and conducted by the Dartmouth Polarization Research Lab, surveyed 1,000 Americans from July 7-20. It has a margin of error of 3 percentage points.

The poll found that 31% said they feel somewhat comfortable discussing the conflict, while 31% said they are not very comfortable and 14% are not comfortable at all.

Asked how comfortable they were sharing their views about the war in Iran, just 29% of respondents said they were very comfortable.

Respondents were also asked how often in the past month they had watched what they said or censored their comments, questions or words, with only 8% saying they had done so nearly every day, while 32% said, “occasionally, a handful of times.”

“Ideally, everyone should be comfortable expressing their opinions about key topics of debate, but most Americans don’t appear to feel that way,” said Nathan Honeycutt, FIRE’s manager of polling and analytics.

“When I heard about this opportunity and the opportunity to build a new business school at Touro, it was an opportunity I just couldn’t pass up,” Larry Singleton told JNS.
The sides finalized plans to expand pilot zones in southern Lebanon as part of a U.S.-brokered framework aimed at restoring Lebanese sovereignty and disarming Hezbollah, the official said.
“I don’t know who he went through,” the board told JNS. “He didn’t go through us.”
“World Vision is severely compromised by ties to Islamist terrorists and a radical left wing climate change agenda,” the senior Trump administration official told JNS. “Why is he funding them?”