Newsletter
Newsletter Support JNS
Martin Sherman

Martin Sherman

Martin Sherman spent seven years in operational capacities in the Israeli defense establishment. He is the founder of the Israel Institute for Strategic Studies (IISS), a member of the Habithonistim-Israel Defense & Security Forum (IDSF) research team, and a participant in the Israel Victory Project.

The resurgence of anti-Israel rhetoric in U.S. discourse reflects deeper and troubling currents in American political culture.
It is patently absurd to refuse to attend a national (or quasi-national) event, in which a democratically elected prime minister participates on the grounds that such attendance endorses him—or his policies.
Much like nature, politics abhors a vacuum. So when U.S. reticence created a power vacuum in Syria, it was Putin and the ayatollahs who were only too eager to fill it.
Israel must convey that it will consider the continuation of the “March of Return” an overt act of war, and all the participants in it enemy combatants who must expect to face all the risks that entails.
According to Ronald Lauder, Israel must be either perilously insecure or demographically untenable. This is an utterly false dichotomy.
In pursuit of bipartisanship, AIPAC should strive to persuade “progressives,” not pander to them, and to convert them, not co-opt them.
Palestinian statehood and a secure Israel are mutually exclusive goals. This was always the accepted wisdom in Israel until the discourse was hijacked by the tyrannical diktats of politically correct dogma.
Israel is approaching a point when it must decide to destroy the capabilities of Hezbollah, rather than attempt to deter the enemy from using them.
It’s difficult to avoid the distinct impression that the unrelenting drive to bring an indictment—any indictment—against Netanyahu has long exceeded the bounds of reasonable law enforcement.