Newsletter
Newsletter Support JNS

Israel, Lebanon agree to 10-day truce

The agreement does not call for a withdrawal of Israeli ground forces from Lebanon and says that the initial ceasefire may be extended “as Lebanon effectively demonstrates its ability to assert its sovereignty.”

Rubio Israel Lebanon
U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio joins working-level peace talks with Israeli Ambassador to the United States Yechiel Leiter and Lebanese Ambassador to the United States Nada Hamadeh Moawad at the Department of State in Washington, D.C., April 14, 2026. Credit: Freddie Everett/U.S. State Department.

Israel and Lebanon agreed to a 10-day ceasefire on Thursday following calls between U.S. president Donald Trump and the leaders of each country.

After Trump announced the truce on social media, the State Department released a statement with details of the agreement between the two sides.

“Israel and Lebanon will implement a cessation of hostilities” that will start at 5 p.m. Eastern on April 16 for “an initial period of 10 days, as a gesture of goodwill by the government of Israel, intended to enable good-faith negotiations toward a permanent security and peace agreement between Israel and Lebanon,” the agreement says.

The agreement adds that Israel will retain a right to self-defense “at any time, against planned, imminent or ongoing attacks” but will otherwise cease offensive military operations in Lebanon.

The agreement does not call for a withdrawal of Israeli ground forces from Lebanon and says that the initial ceasefire may be extended “as Lebanon effectively demonstrates its ability to assert its sovereignty.”

That condition appears to be tied to Lebanon’s ability to disarm Hezbollah, as the agreement requires the Lebanese government to take “meaningful steps” from the time the ceasefire begins to prevent Hezbollah and other terrorist groups from attacking Israel from Lebanese territory.

Trump wrote in a followup post to the truce announcement that he would invite Lebanese President Joseph Aoun and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to the White House for “meaningful talks.”

The agreement released by the State Department says that those negotiations would be designed to resolve “all remaining issues” and reach a comprehensive peace agreement between Israel and Lebanon, which do not have diplomatic relations and have technically been in a state of war since Israel’s founding in 1948.

An open question about any ceasefire in Lebanon is whether Israel can prevent Hezbollah from carrying out attacks on Israeli border communities.

In a statement confirming the ceasefire, Netanyahu said that the agreement allowed for Israeli troops to maintain a “reinforced security buffer zone” inside Lebanon.

“This allows us, first and foremost, to block the danger of an invasion into our communities, and secondly, it allows us to prevent direct anti-tank fire into the communities,” Netanyahu said. “The residents are now protected from these two dangers.”

Netanyahu added that he had received assurances from Trump that the U.S. president intends to continue the naval blockade of Iran and dismantle the regime’s remaining nuclear capabilities.

Andrew Bernard is the Washington correspondent for JNS.org.
Tehran stated that it has halted indirect negotiations with Washington, arguing that Israel’s military campaign in Lebanon violates the terms of the U.S.-Iran ceasefire.
The scheduled resumption of service comes at an opportune moment for Israel’s flagship carrier, with United’s service on the route indefinitely suspended.
“Especially in today’s times, it’s more important than ever to show up, proud and loud,” Allie Levine, who attended the parade in Manhattan, told JNS.
The French government informed Israeli officials that while some Israeli defense companies may be permitted to attend, they will be restricted to displaying air-defense systems.
A U.S. district judge ruled that Jewish Voice for Peace failed to adequately show that city officials infringed on the group’s First Amendment rights by restricting pro-Palestinian demonstrations.
A U.S. district judge ruled that the plaintiffs did not sufficiently establish a connection between Binance’s conduct and the Hamas-led terrorist attacks under federal anti-terrorism law.