Newsletter
Newsletter Support JNS

New Jersey court upholds civil commitment of sex offender citing antisemitic letters

The man sent “several antisemitic and sexually derogatory letters” to the female prosecutor who tried his case, according to the ruling.

Gavel, Courtroom
Gavel on a courtroom table. Credit: Joe Gratz via Wikimedia Commons.

A New Jersey appellate court on Monday upheld the civil commitment of a man as a sexually violent predator, affirming a lower-court order remanding him to the state’s Special Treatment Unit.

A two-judge panel of the Superior Court’s appellate division agreed with the court’s law division that the man—identified only by his initials—continues to meet the statutory criteria for commitment under the state’s Sexually Violent Predator Act.

Prosecutors said the man sent “several antisemitic and sexually derogatory letters” to the female prosecutor who tried his case, according to the ruling. The opinion does not identify the prosecutor or indicate whether she is Jewish.

An expert witness also cited the man’s “repeated infractions while incarcerated,” including letters described as “offensive or misogynistic, antisemitic, [and] harassing.” The opinion does not specify whether those letters were sent to the same prosecutor or to others.

The man argued his letter-writing was protected under the First Amendment. The appellate panel rejected that claim.

“The letters were relevant to the determination of whether” the man “met the criteria of a sexually violent predator,” the court said, and were therefore admissible.

Under New Jersey law, individuals designated as sexually violent predators may be civilly committed to the Special Treatment Unit after completing their criminal sentences if courts find they pose a continuing danger and are likely to commit acts of sexual violence if released.

Mike Wagenheim is a Washington-based correspondent for JNS, primarily covering the U.S. State Department and Congress. He is the senior U.S. correspondent at the Israel-based i24NEWS TV network.
Abdulkadir Al-Jelani, 58, is due in court on July 1 and faces charges of making the threats and three counts of assault with a weapon.
The designations include Hezbollah-linked institutions that “threaten regional stability, international security, mutual interests and global trade,” the U.S. Treasury Department stated.
Gerard Filitti, of the Lawfare Project, told JNS that “lax immigration policy” has always been the main driver of importing “terrorist ideology” into the United States.
“The teachers we have, we don’t respect and support in the way that they deserve,” Paul Bernstein told JNS. “If we’re successful and we grow enrollment, that problem only gets bigger.”
“The message being sent is that you can get away with attacking someone in broad daylight because you disagree with their opinions, especially if it involves feelings about Israel,” Joshua Burt, of the Anti-Defamation League, told JNS.
“Not identifying Hamas as a terrorist organization is, I think, a failure, Marc Miller told the Canadian Press. “And not clearly stating that, for example, Hamas intended to kill Jews is, I think, an unfortunate error in curation and should be rectified.”