Newsletter
Newsletter Support JNS

Holocaust remembrance is not a litmus test for Jews

There is a difference between good faith debate and bad faith demands.

A Star of David in the Ari Ashkenazi Synagogue in Safed, Israel (2011). Credit: Roy Lindman at English Wikipedia via Wikimedia Commons.
A Star of David in the Ari Ashkenazi Synagogue in Safed, Israel (2011). Credit: Roy Lindman at English Wikipedia via Wikimedia Commons.
Alyssa Grzesh is executive director of the American Association of Jewish Lawyers and Jurists, and a vice president of the Jewish Lawyers Guild.

On Holocaust Remembrance Day, we are meant to reflect on where hatred leads when it is ignored, excused or repackaged in more acceptable language.

It should be a moment of clarity.

Instead, it has increasingly become a moment when Jews are asked to prove their moral legitimacy by publicly denouncing the State of Israel.

There is a question that too few are willing to ask openly: Why is there a unique expectation that Jews must publicly denounce the Jewish state in order to be considered credible on issues of justice and human rights?

No such demand is imposed on anyone else. Public officials are not required to answer for every alleged abuse committed by their country of origin. Muslims are not expected to condemn every act carried out by Muslim-majority nations. Christians are not asked to disclaim the crimes historically committed in their name before being permitted to speak.

Yet when it comes to Jews, the expectation is different. Silence is treated as complicity. Nuance is treated as evasion. And even when Jews do speak critically, their words are often taken out of context and used to advance broader efforts that seek not reform, but the delegitimization of the Jewish state itself.

That is the bind. Speak, and your words are weaponized. Decline to perform condemnation on demand, and your integrity is questioned. This is not a universal standard. It is a double standard.

Let me be clear: Israel is not committing genocide. That accusation, repeated so casually in public discourse, is not only false; it is a profound distortion of a term that carries the gravest meaning in law and history.

What Israel faces is not theoretical. It is a matter of survival.

And for many Jews, that reality is not abstract but personal.

Reasonable people can disagree with the policies of any government, including Israel’s. But disagreement does not justify demands for the erasure of a state, and by extension, the people who live there. That is not accountability. It is something far more dangerous.

I will not participate in a ritual of compelled denunciation built on a premise I do not accept. I will not tailor my words to satisfy those who approach this issue with a double standard or whose demands are rooted less in a commitment to truth than in a desire to extract moral concessions.

There is a difference between good faith debate and bad faith demands.

Holocaust remembrance is not a forum for imposing litmus tests on Jews. It is a moment to remember what happens when language is distorted, when legal concepts are manipulated and when Jews are once again placed in a position of having to justify their own existence.

Am Yisrael Chai: The people of Israel live.

Those are my people. They face danger every day. And like any other people, they should not be held personally responsible for the actions of a government simply because of who they are.

That is a standard no one else is asked to meet. I will not accept it for Jews.

Many reservists were called up in the middle of the night for the surprise exercise, part of the military’s post-Oct. 7 testing of readiness.
The U.S. president said he would be willing to accept a 20-year freeze on Tehran’s nuclear program, but only with proper guarantees.
Those who mark “Nakba Day” are ignoring the real cause of the mass Arab migration in 1948, the Israeli Foreign Ministry said.
Skirmishes to Israel’s north continue despite the announcement of a 45-day extension of the ceasefire.
“The name of the arch-terrorist Izz al-Din al-Haddad came up again and again” when speaking with the freed abductees, the IDF chief said.
Mohammad Baqer Saad Dawood Al-Saadi “directed and urged others to attack U.S. and Israeli interests and to kill Americans and Jews in the U.S. and abroad,” the Justice Department said.