Newsletter
Newsletter Support JNS

US Supreme Court Justice Ginsburg to participate in oral arguments from hospital

The 87-year-old, who has sat on America’s highest court since 1993, has been experiencing health issues over the past few years.

U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg. Credit: European University Institute/Flickr.
U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg. Credit: European University Institute/Flickr.

U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg was hospitalized on Tuesday with an infection in her gallbladder, though is expected to participate in oral arguments on Wednesday, said the Supreme Court.

“Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg underwent non-surgical treatment for acute cholecystitis, a benign gallbladder condition, this afternoon at Johns Hopkins Hospital in Baltimore, Maryland,” said the Supreme Court in a statement. “Following oral arguments on Monday, the Justice underwent outpatient tests at Sibley Memorial Hospital in Washington, D.C., that confirmed she was suffering from a gall stone that had migrated to her cystic duct, blocking it and causing an infection.”

The nation’s highest court went on to say that Ginsburg, 87, “is resting comfortably and plans to participate in the oral argument teleconference tomorrow morning remotely from the hospital. She expects to stay in the hospital for a day or two. Updates will be provided as they become available.”

Ginsburg, who has sat on America’s highest court since 1993, has been experiencing health issues over the past few years.

In August 2019, she underwent radiation for a tumor on her pancreas.

In December 2018, Ginsburg underwent surgery to remove cancerous nodules from her lungs.

“The legal system has sent a clear message. Illegal activity that compromises public safety is allowed in the Bay Area,” Tali Klima of Bay Area Jewish Coalition told JNS.
The sides discussed a U.S.-supervised communication mechanism involving Ankara that would prevent escalation in Syrian territory.
IDF troops seized the suspect in the area of the attack on Sunday afternoon.
“We are, as always, troubled when antisemitic tropes are invoked in purported service of a business dispute,” the film production company said as the feud went viral.