Newsletter
Newsletter Support JNS

Former Hamas captive Gilad Shalit meets hostages’ families

Shalit reportedly expressed his support for the families and told them that their loved ones would be able to survive and recover.

Gilad Shalit
Gilad Shalit and his then-girlfriend attend the Fourth international Jerusalem Marathon on March 21, 2014. Photo by Mendy Hechtman/Flash90.

Gilad Shalit, who was held hostage for over five years by Hamas in Gaza, recently met with the families of Israelis kidnapped during the terror group’s Oct. 7 massacre, Israeli media reported on Monday.

Shalit, 37, was captured by Hamas in a 2006 cross-border attack and released in 2011 in exchange for over 1,000 Palestinian security prisoners, including Yahya Sinwar, who would go on to become the terror group’s commander in Gaza and a key mastermind of the Oct. 7 attack.

The controversial prisoner exchange, which was approved by Israel following years of public protests, was the largest in Israel’s history.

Shalit, who reached out to relatives of those abducted on Oct. 7, expressed his support for the families and told them that their loved ones would be able to survive and recover, despite the difficulties, Channel 12 news reported.

According to the report, Shalit, who has kept a low profile following his release and has since gotten married, told the group that their loved ones could return and live full, happy lives.

The dollar continues to weaken against the Israeli currency.
“The Iranian terror regime must not obtain nuclear weapons,” Gideon Sa’ar stressed.
“Our teams will continue to track down those responsible for such brazen acts of violence,” the police chief said.
“This is our land. We are not here as guests; we are not here temporarily,” Knesset Speaker Amir Ohana said at the inauguration ceremony.
The Lebanese Shi’ite terrorist organization is being forced to choose between facing Israel alone and giving up its objectives. Meanwhile, distrust of America is deepening in the Gulf.
International condemnation of U.S.-Israel action reveals selective legal reasoning, political bias and a failure to confront Tehran’s ongoing violations and threats.