Newsletter
Newsletter Support JNS

Israeli High Court rejects demands for anti-war protests

The court agreed with police that such protests would constitute a critical burden on law enforcement.

Palestinian and left-wing activists protest against the expulsion of Arab families from their homes in the eastern Jerusalem neighborhood of Sheikh Jarrah on Jan. 13, 2023. Photo by Jamal Awad/Flash90.
Palestinian and left-wing activists protest against the expulsion of Arab families from their homes in the eastern Jerusalem neighborhood of Sheikh Jarrah on Jan. 13, 2023. Photo by Jamal Awad/Flash90.

Israel’s High Court of Justice on Wednesday rejected a petition by the communist party Hadash demanding that police allow anti-war protests in the Arab towns of Umm al-Fahm and Sakhnin.

Police had earlier rejected the requests, saying the protests would impose a manpower burden and could lead to an “all-out flareup.”

Judge Yitzhak Amit said there was no basis for the petitioners’ claim that Israel Police Commissioner Yaakov Shabtai had issued a sweeping ban on demonstrations generally, noting that police had made it clear that each request for a demonstration would be examined on its merits.

Amit emphasized the manpower argument in his decision, noting that police are working 12-hour shifts in the country’s coastal and northern districts, where Umm al-Fahm and Sakhnin are located.

“At this time, given the heavy workload the police have been dealing with for about a month, they are unable to allocate the manpower required to ensure public order in the protests that are the subject of the petition,” he said.

Judges Ruth Ronen and Yael Wilner agreed with Amit, focusing on the manpower issue.

Amit said that the verdict was “given against the background of the concrete circumstances that were presented to us,” adding, “This does not mean that at any time of war or throughout the duration of the fighting, there is no place for holding demonstrations.”

He emphasized that “the right to public criticism and political protest has not been withdrawn.” He suggested that the organizers consider holding a rally in a closed hall.

“If the government wants credit for resolving discrimination complaints, it has to also do the hard part, which is enforcement,” Mark Goldfeder of the National Jewish Advocacy Center told JNS.
“The reason they want to make a deal is they have been just beat to s***,” Trump said.
“The problem is money and politics,” the New Jersey senator told JNS. “And I think I want to lead by example.”
The goal is for the principle of “one authority, one law, and one weapon” to apply to all armed groups in the Strip.
Landmark ruling backs 2023 designation and convicts four for stockpiling weapons across Europe for attacks on Jewish and Israeli targets.
“Supporting bereaved families is a sacred responsibility that reflects the deep bond between Israel’s supporters around the world and those who have made the greatest sacrifice on behalf of the State of Israel,” the head of the group said.