Newsletter
Newsletter Support JNS

Months after UN lifted arms embargo on Iran, ‘dam hasn’t burst’ yet

America has maintained its own arms embargo on Iran; Russia has yet to sign major arms contracts with Tehran, but concern exists over future potential sales of air-defense systems, anti-ship missiles and fighter jets, says Col. (res.) Udi Evental.

Missiles of Iran’s armed forces, Sept. 9, 2019. Credit: Saeediex/Shutterstock.
Missiles of Iran’s armed forces, Sept. 9, 2019. Credit: Saeediex/Shutterstock.

Nine months after the U.N. arms embargo on Iran has expired, there has not been a major new trend of sales of international arms to the Islamic Republic so far.

Yet a potential danger remains of Iran seeking to purchase fighter jets, advanced missile defenses and anti-ship missiles from Russia in the future, a former Israeli defense official has told JNS.

In October 2020, Iran announced that the U.N. Security Council arms embargo, placed in 2007 to pressure the Iranian regime to abandon its nuclear arms program, had been lifted. Iranian officials described the development at the time as a diplomatic victory for the Islamic Republic with the Iranian Foreign Minister, Mohammed Zarif, tweeting: “The normalization obtained today for cooperating with Iran in the area of defense is a victory for the principle of reciprocity, peace and security in our area.”

In reality, Iran remains the prime cause of destabilization and radicalism in the region, nourishing its network of armed proxies with weapons that are produced by its increasingly sophisticated domestic-weapons industry.

Yet while Iran is also keen on importing arms from abroad, the fact that United States has kept its own arms embargo on Iran in place has helped prevent “the dam from bursting,” said Col. (res.) Udi Evental, senior research fellow at the Institute for Policy and Strategy at the Interdisciplinary Center in Herzliya.

Evental served as the former head of the Strategic Planning Unit of the Political-Military and Policy Bureau at the Israeli Defense Ministry, as well as Israel’s intelligence attaché in Washington.

In September 2020, the Trump administration snapped back all of the sanctions that the United Nations had imposed on Iran, including the arms embargo. In February 2021, the Biden administration, for its part, said it was canceling the snapback sanctions, but it never declared that it was recognizing the lifting of the arms embargo, noted Evental.

“The U.S. has resisted lifting its own embargo,” said Evental. “America has not recognized the end of the arms embargo on Iran.”

“Since then, the Americans have not really dealt with the issue, but the U.S. has not canceled secondary sanctions against all states that sell arms to Iran,” he noted.

The issue has turned into a legal dispute in the United Nations, and America’s isolated position on the matter has meant that it refrains from publicly discussing it.

In June, when reports of Iranian warships heading to Venezuela with weapons on-board surfaced, the United States applied major pressure to disrupt the transfer, said Evental, describing the development as a de facto arms embargo, which bans both Iranian weapons exports and imports.

As a result of Washington’s position, in the past nine months there has been no major visible movement of Iranian weapons purchases, he added.

Another factor that seems to be holding up Iranian arms acquisitions is Iran’s own difficult economic situation, which means that it is unclear how able it is to afford major purchases and pay suppliers on time.

The European Union and the United Kingdom have their own separate arms export embargos on Iran—banning the sales of weapons, including missiles—in place until 2023.

According to Evental, Western states are deterred by Iran’s illegal conduct around the region and gross violation of other U.N. Security Council, such as 1701, which bans weapons supplies to Hezbollah in Southern Lebanon—an area already brimming with Iranian-supplied weapons, including attempts to construct precision-guided missiles.

U.N. Security Council Resolution 2216, which bans weapons transfers to the Houthis in Yemen, is another resolution trampled by Iran with impunity. Iran also supplies its radical Shi’ite militias in Iraq with an array of weapons.

‘Three weapons systems that would generate concern’

Evental noted that Russia’s willingness to supply Iran with weapons is the most significant test of the past nine months that followed the lifting of the embargo.

While Russia has said it is willing to export arms to Tehran, “in reality, we haven’t seen big contracts,” he said. Any big contract “should have been on the table, since Russia has been the element that expressed the most support for the lifting of the embargo.”

The reasons for this include the fact that Russia’s own defense export sector has been under American sanctions since 2017, as part of America’s response to Moscow’s intervention in Ukraine and in the U.S. elections. “Every state that purchases Russian arms or is in deep ties with its defense sector is sanctioned. This happened to Turkey, which purchased the Russian S-400 air-defense system. It could happen to the Egyptians if they proceed with reported intentions to purchase the Sokhoi-35 fighter jet,” explained Evental.

With the Russian defense sector also facing American sanctions, Russia is likely not keen to publicize any talks with Iran about selling weapons in such an environment.

In addition, Russia wants the Vienna nuclear talks between world powers and Iran to end with an agreement, said Evental, and “selling offensive or threatening weapons could create disruptive tensions and undermine this wish.”

In June, reports surfaced that Russia was preparing to supply Iran with an advanced spy satellite. The United States released detailed messages on the sale, though Russian President Vladimir Putin dismissed the reports as fake news.

“The Russians are hiding their activities,” concluded Evental, adding that it’s possible that smaller deals with Iran are taking place, for instance, with the sale of parts, equipment and technology.

From Israel’s perspective, there are three main weapons systems that would generate concern if they became the subject of sales from Russia. The first is the S-400 air-defense system, which Evental described as strategic, as it could provide the Iranians with a sense of immunity and increase their nuclear activities under the cover of advanced air defenses over nuclear sites.

The Yakhont supersonic anti-ship missile, which has a range of hundreds of kilometers, also forms a strategic threat because of how the Iranians could use it to threaten Israeli shipping around the region, cautioned Evental.

Fighter jets form the third central concern purchase for Israel. “Today, Iran can’t reach Israel with planes. If they acquire advanced Russian jets, such as the ones that Moscow wants to sell Egypt, that could form a problem as Iran could deploy the planes in all sorts of places in the region,” he said. “For Israel, this would be a threatening wish list.”

Still, he stressed, so far, there are no indications that such sales are going ahead.

Yaakov Lappin is an Israel-based military affairs correspondent and analyst. He is the in-house analyst at the Miryam Institute; a research associate at the Alma Research and Education Center; and a research associate at the Begin-Sadat Center for Strategic Studies at Bar-Ilan University. He is a frequent guest commentator on international television news networks, including Sky News and i24 News. Lappin is the author of Virtual Caliphate: Exposing the Islamist State on the Internet. Follow him at: www.patreon.com/yaakovlappin.
The public school referred JNS to its law dean, who interpreted the lawsuit settlement differently than does the other party.
The United Arab Emirates signaled it could join a push to secure the waterway against Iran, but most allies remain reluctant to intervene directly.
The Israeli foreign minister told his British counterpart that violence is rising and Lebanon has failed to curb Hezbollah.
Waiting a week “costs the town nothing and guarantees that every eligible voter in Surfside, regardless of religious observance, can participate in choosing their next mayor,” the firm bringing the suit said.
“We are going to wipe out their defense industrial base,” the U.S. secretary of state said.
David Soffer, of the Combat Antisemitism Movement, said that “since policymakers chose clarity and consistency in the fight against antisemitism, Jewish Wisconsinites are safer today.”