Newsletter
Newsletter Support JNS

Lawfare Project probes Canadian charities over co-funds to terrorist entities

“The charitable regime exists to support humanitarian work, not to provide a vehicle for funding extremism or activities that undermine Canadian law,” stated Brooke Goldstein.

Flag of Canada
Canadian flag. Credit: ElasticComputeFarm/Pixabay.

The Lawfare Project launched an investigation into whether some Canadian charities are sending funds overseas to extremist or terrorist-linked entities, “potentially violating Canadian law” and rules governing charitable status, it said.

The group said its fact-finding effort follows “publicly reported concerns,” including a 2024 Toronto Sun investigation that it said identified “significant irregularities: in filings by several pro-Palestinian charities with the Canada Revenue Agency.

The Lawfare Project said reporting relied on documents from before Oct. 7, and due to filing delays, “the post-Oct. 7 picture is still emerging.”

“The charitable regime exists to support humanitarian work, not to provide a vehicle for funding extremism or activities that undermine Canadian law,” stated Brooke Goldstein, founder and executive director of Lawfare Project.

“A closer review” is needed “to protect the integrity of Canada’s charitable system,” she said.

A letter to the New York Times Company seeks an inspection of documents meant to investigate whether the paper bypassed its corporate governance.
“There is a perverse normalcy to the violent acts of antisemitism occurring on a regular basis in Canada,” a member of the University of Toronto governing council said.
“This Sunday, we will show the entire world, especially public figures who attack Israel to advance themselves politically, that we are here to stay,” the Israeli consul general in New York stated.
Activists with the pro-Palestinian group PAL-AWDA attempted to push through police barricades and shouted calls for violence outside the event featuring Jerusalem Mayor Moshe Lion.
The court granted South Africa 18 months to file its reply and gave Israel an equal period to submit its rejoinder, despite the Jewish state’s argument that a second round of pleadings was unnecessary.
“There is no way Mamdani could march in a parade that celebrates Zionism without inflaming his radical Muslim fans,” Bill Donohue said.