Newsletter
Newsletter Support JNS

Waiver clause threatens integrity of Israeli equivalent to America’s Taylor Force Act

“We managed to get Taylor Force passed without any type of waiver whatsoever, which was a difficult and noteworthy accomplishment,” said Sander Gerber, a New York-based hedge fund executive who was a strong proponent of the Taylor Force Act. “Any Israeli equivalent of the law should also be passed without a waiver.”

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu (right) and then Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman at a meeting of the Likud-Beiteinu faction in the Knesset on March 11, 2014.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu (right) and then Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman at a meeting of the Likud-Beiteinu faction in the Knesset on March 11, 2014.

Israel’s Knesset Foreign Affairs and Defense Committee will hold a hearing om Tuesday to discuss the government’s proposed law to offset payments to the Palestinian Authority that are then paid out to jailed terrorists and families of terrorists killed in the act of attempted murder. Central to the committee’s discussions will be a waiver clause loophole that would allow the Israeli government to make the withheld payments to the Palestinian Authority at a later date.

Each month, Israel pays approximately NIS 600 million ($170 million) per month to P.A. as part of a tax-collection arrangement brokered during the signing of the 1993 Oslo Accords, whereby Israel collects and transfers import duties at Israeli ports on behalf of the Palestinian Authority. Under the proposed government law, the Israeli tax transfers would be offset by any sums that are scheduled to be paid out to terrorists or their families.

Yet within the government’s proposed version of the law, offset funds would be held aside while a waiver clause would enable the government to take executive decision to pass the funds, regardless of the P.A.’s adherence to the law’s requirements.

Itamar Marcus, founder of Palestinian Media Watch (PMW), an Israeli nongovernmental organization (NGO) that monitors payments made by the P.A. to terrorists and their families told JNS that “the waiver makes the law completely ineffective.”

In March, the United States passed the Taylor Force Act that effectively ends any American foreign aid to the P.A. unless it ceases to pay stipends to the terrorists and their families.

New York-based hedge fund executive Sander Gerber, who played a significant role in advancing the Taylor Force Act and is actively promoting the passage of an equivalent law in Israel, notes that “the U.S. law is strong particularly because it doesn’t have a waiver.”

“We managed to get Taylor Force passed without any type of waiver whatsoever, which was a difficult and noteworthy accomplishment,” he told JNS. “Any Israeli equivalent of the law should also be passed without a waiver.”

In addition to the government law, is a stronger version of the law first proposed by opposition Knesset member Elazar Stern (Yesh Atid Party). While Stern’s law calls does not provide for any waiver, laws advanced by the government have a greater chance of being passed by the parliamentary coalition.

In between readings, laws can be adjusted and strengthened. For a law to pass, it must go through three readings in the Knesset. Both the government’s law and Stern’s law have passed their first readings.

An ad-hoc coalition of NGOs, including PMW, and terror victims has been invited to Tuesday’s committee hearing, where they will recommend changes that would shore up the government law’s loophole.

This law is being advanced by Defense Minister Avigdor Lieberman, who has recently tweeted tough statements on the P.A.’s “pay-to-slay” scheme—a term coined by Gerber.

After the government law passed its first reading, Lieberman tweeted that the “insanity of transferring money to the Palestinian Authority, which then uses it against us by encouraging terror, will stop,” adding “we’ll make sure the bill is approved in second and third readings as soon as possible.”

Yet, according to PMW’s Marcus, “while the Defense Minister has offered tough talk, the law he is proposing has no teeth,” as long as the waiver exists. “Lieberman himself can strengthen this law,” he said.

“All Knesset members—right-wing and left-wing alike—agree that the waiver takes away all of the law’s power,” continued Marcus. “We are working on with the committee on compromises that will significantly strengthen the law, and limit the government’s ability to institute a waiver.”

Rather than have the funds sit on the side, with the possibility of a later transfer, Marcus and other proponents of the law are pushing for any offset funds to be paid out to victims of terror, as opposed to the terrorists. Many victims and families of victims have rulings from Israeli courts that entitle them to reparation payments from the Palestinian Authority—the majority of which have never been paid.

“All judgments need to be paid out to the victims of terror,” said Marcus. “That is the first priority.”

Alex Traiman is the CEO and Jerusalem bureau chief of the Jewish News Syndicate (JNS) and host of “Jerusalem Minute.” A seasoned Israeli journalist, documentary filmmaker and startup consultant, he is an expert on Israeli politics and U.S.-Israel relations. He has interviewed top political figures, including Israeli leaders, U.S. senators and national security officials with insights featured on major networks like BBC, Bloomberg, CBS, NBC, Fox and Newsmax. A former NCAA champion fencer and Yeshiva University Sports Hall of Fame member, he made aliyah in 2004, and lives in Jerusalem with his wife and five children.
“These movements don’t stop with a boycott. We know where this is going, and that’s why we are going to get out ahead of it,” an attorney at the center told JNS.
On May 9, vandals spray-painted antisemitic symbols and Bible references on the Waukesha County memorial, which includes a steel beam from the World Trade Center.
“I’m not sure we should make the deal if they don’t sign,” the U.S. president said at a cabinet meeting on Wednesday. “I think they owe that to us.”
The protest was “a powerful show of solidarity,” Jayne Zirkle of the Lawfare Project told JNS. “To condemn people for attending such an event is to condemn the very principles of freedom our nation was founded on.”
“If publicly-funded institutions cannot host such events without folding to pressure, serious questions arise about that funding,” a Jewish House of Lords member said.
The attacks followed Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s announcement on Tuesday that the IDF is deepening its operations in Lebanon.