Newsletter
Newsletter Support JNS

Netanyahu: Pressure from Israeli opposition forced Lapid to withdraw from maritime deal with Lebanon

“Nasrallah threatened - and Lapid folded,” tweeted opposition leader Benjamin Netanyahu on Thursday.

Likud Party Chairman Benjamin Netanyahu, then leader of the opposition, prepares to cast his vote in the Likud primary at a polling station in Tel Aviv on Aug. 10, 2022. Photo by Tomer Neuberg/Flash90.
Likud Party Chairman Benjamin Netanyahu, then leader of the opposition, prepares to cast his vote in the Likud primary at a polling station in Tel Aviv on Aug. 10, 2022. Photo by Tomer Neuberg/Flash90.

Likud party leader Benjamin Netanyahu credited the Israeli opposition’s response to Prime Minister Yair Lapid’s backing of a U.S.-brokered maritime deal with Lebanon for Lapid’s sudden turn against the pending agreement.

“[Hezbollah leader Hassan] Nasrallah threatened - and Lapid folded,” Netanyahu tweeted on Thursday.

“Israel needs a different leadership, and experienced and strong prime minister who stands up to pressure and does not fold in the face of threats. We will not surrender to Nasrallah,” he added.

Lapid rejected the Lebanese government’s proposed changes to a maritime border and gas extraction agreement, a senior Israeli political source said on Thursday.

On Tuesday, Beirut’s deputy parliament speaker sent U.S. officials “amendments” to the draft accord, prompting a American official to tell Israeli media the suggested modifications did not include a “poison pill” that could torpedo the initiative.

The deal draws a border between the two countries’ exclusive economic zones (EEZs) based on a boundary known as Line 23. It awards a disputed area of around 840 square kilometers (9,042 square feet) to Lebanon while recognizing Israel’s claim to royalties from the section of the Qana gas field that extends into Israel’s EEZ.

“We’ll show up strong, with pride and solidarity, and keep the focus on peaceful support,” Yehuda Sichel, who owns Huda in downtown Philadelphia, told JNS.
“The reason we lost is the war,” the U.S. vice president wrote. “If you’d like to argue it was worth it, that losing the Senate for the next six years was worth it, then do so” but “that’s at least honest.”
“They want to make sure that nobody else dares to put principle ahead of party,” Alyza Lewin, of the Combat Antisemitism Movement, told JNS. “That’s why I think they’re being particularly nasty.”
The new technique significantly improves the chances of success and shortens recovery.