Newsletter
Newsletter Support JNS

Yale University report on public trust in higher ed does not mention antisemitism

One professor who served on the committee that created the report said the Trump administration’s accusations of antisemitism at Yale “were a pretty serious exaggeration.”

Sterling Memorial Library at Yale University in New Haven, Conn., with a statue of Moses with horns protruding from his head. Photo by Karyn Bell.
Sterling Memorial Library at Yale University in New Haven, Conn., with a statue of Moses with horns protruding from his head. Photo by Karyn Bell.

A Yale University report examining declining public trust in higher education did not list antisemitism among its primary concerns.

The “Report of the Yale Committee on Trust in Higher Education,” published on April 10, concluded that distrust in universities stems largely from rising costs; a difficult admissions process; and concerns about “political homogeneity, self-censorship and grade inflation.”

While the report mentioned antisemitism and Jewish quotas in the 1920s as a reference point for understanding the issue of prioritizing demographics in admissions, it does not mention hatred on campus as an issue.

The report said that Yale “navigated campus conflicts over the Oct. 7, 2023, attacks on Israel and the war in Gaza with less long-term friction than some of its peer institutions.”

English professor David Bromwich served on the committee of 10 faculty members that created the report over the course of a year. He told the student newspaper that the Trump administration’s accusations of antisemitism at Yale “were a pretty serious exaggeration,” adding that “to say there’s something like a crisis of antisemitism on campus just doesn’t seem accurate.”

The Anti-Defamation League gave Yale a “C” on its antisemitism report card for “campus conduct and climate concerns,” including “severe antisemitic and anti-Zionist incidents.”

Sarath Sanga, a law professor who served on the committee, told the student paper that “we did not try to adjudicate the events of the past two years. What we tried to do is strengthen the framework within which the university can meet such moments with clarity rather than with drift, rather than being dragged along by social forces.”

He stated that “the exclusion of a word or a person or an idea from the report should not be interpreted that that thing is not important.”

“He’s tried to find that middle ground, where he can give a wink and a nod to those kinds of very violent extremist rhetoric, but without being forced to condemn it,” David May, of FDD, told JNS.
Robinson De La Cruz Hilario told authorities that his posts praising Pulse nightclub shooter Omar Mateen and depicting a firearm and imagery associated with neo-Nazi groups were intended to instill fear.
Speaking on behalf of the E5, the French envoy to the global body said that those bidding for construction contracts in Judea and Samaria and eastern Jerusalem risk “legal and reputational consequences.”
“I have a passport that I was just born with,” Laura Pinho said during a CodePink webinar. “How can I live in this world if I don’t make every effort to equalize the playing field in whatever way that I can?
Secular activist Naor Narkis’s suggestion that Religious Zionist soldiers’ casualty rates might not be so high were they to do “full military service” was “unnecessary,” said Golan.
“Hamas’s actions are time and again ignored by human rights organizations,” the Defense Ministry unit said.