Newsletter
Newsletter Support JNS

International legal group works to remove Holocaust-denial content on Facebook

The actions by the Lawfare Project came following controversial comments by Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg, saying he does not believe that Holocaust-denial content should be removed.

Facebook's founder and CEO Mark Zuckerberg. Credit: Wikimedia Commons.
Facebook’s founder and CEO Mark Zuckerberg. Credit: Wikimedia Commons.

The Lawfare Project filed take-down notices this week against Facebook posts denying the Holocaust and containing anti-Semitic material, successfully leading to several posts being removed or blocked by Facebook in a number of countries.

The actions by the international legal firm came following controversial comments last week by Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg, saying he does not believe that Holocaust-denial content should be removed.

“I don’t believe that our platform should take that down because I think there are things that different people get wrong. I don’t think that they’re intentionally getting it wrong,” he said.

Zuckerberg later clarified his statement, saying that he finds Holocaust denial “deeply offensive.”

Facebook had drawn criticism over the fact that it would allow Infowars—a site that traffics in conspiracy theories—to remain on the social-media platform. Nevertheless, Facebook did say that it would begin to remove content that is flagged, escalated and confirmed by local partners as false and possibly contributing to violence.

As such, the Lawfare Project’s Spanish counsel, Ignacio Wenley Palacios, set out to demonstrate that Facebook’s takedown policy is inconsistent. In several European countries, Holocaust denial violates both criminal and civil law, and is considered libel against the Jewish people.

“In just two days, takedown notices filed online have resulted in the removal of several anti-Semitic posts containing Holocaust denial, abusive content or racism. Whenever we find blatant Holocaust denial that Facebook refuses to remove, we will file legal proceedings to ensure that Facebook does not follow Mr. Zuckerberg’s stated approach,” stated Palacios.

Facebook’s current takedown policy, enforced by algorithms and people manually reviewing content, does not permit content that violates a wide variety of hate speech, including “anything that directly attacks people based on what are known as their “protected characteristics”—race, ethnicity, national origin, religious affiliation, sexual orientation, sex, gender, gender identity, or serious disability or disease.”

In contrast with Holocaust denial, much of this hate speech is legal.

Brooke Goldstein, director of the Lawfare Project, said: “Facebook bans hate speech that attacks groups based on ethnicity or religious affiliation, so statements should be removed if they attack the Jewish people, an ethno-religious group. In countries such as Spain, where Holocaust denial violates civil and criminal law, we will continue taking action to get it removed.”

Limor Son Har-Melech, who introduced the bill and whose husband was murdered in a 2003 terror attack, stated that the “historic law” means that “whoever chooses to murder Jews because they are Jews forfeits their right to live.”
Either Iran “agrees to abide by international law, or a coalition of nations from around the world and the region will make sure that it’s open,” the U.S. secretary of state said.
Lawyers for the council said that Queens councilmember Vickie Paladino sought the subpoenas “with the sole purpose of creating a public spectacle.”
The holiday appears as “a living educational framework—a connection between Jewish communities in Israel and abroad, and a reflection of the strength of these communities across generations.”
“It becomes comfort, continuity and a way to feel connected to tradition and to one another at home,” Talia Sabag, of the Manischewitz parent company Kayko, told JNS.
The mayor said the NYPD informed him of the alleged firebombing plot against Within Our Lifetime co-founder Nerdeen Kiswani a day after a New Jersey man was charged for the threat.