Newsletter
Newsletter Support JNS

Israeli FM says PA ‘can’t rule Gaza’ after war

The Palestinian Authority devotes 7% of its budget to paying stipends to terrorists, including some who participated in the Oct. 7 attacks, says Israel Katz.

Israel Katz at the United Nations
Israeli Foreign Minister Israel Katz shortly before his speech at the U.N. Security Council, March 11, 2024. Photo by Shlomi Amsalem/MFA.

Israeli Foreign Minister Israel Katz said on Tuesday that the Palestinian Authority cannot be allowed to rule post-war Gaza, citing its ongoing financial support for terrorism.

“7% of the Palestinian Authority’s budget goes to murderers of Israelis. More killings = more money. The Palestinian Authority cannot rule Gaza,” he tweeted. The post includes a short video highlighting the fact that the P.A.'s payments to terrorists scale with the number of Jews they killed.

The controversial Palestinian policy, referred to by Israel as “pay for slay” or “pay to slay,” has been a sticking point for the United States, which has called for a “reformed” P.A. to take over in Gaza once Israel topples Hamas there.

The policy calls for the paying of monthly stipends to convicted terrorists, released security prisoners and the families of those killed while trying to murder Jews.

Palestinian officials have repeatedly stressed they will never stop the payments, with Abbas saying in 2018 that if Ramallah had only “a single penny left, we would pay it to families of the martyrs and prisoners.”

In the aftermath of the Oct. 7 attack, some 661 Hamas members from Gaza were among the 3,550 terrorists imprisoned in Israel to receive the stipends, according to Palestine Media Watch, a Jerusalem-based non-profit research institute.

Stipends were also received by the families of 23,210 slain “martyrs,” according to PMW.

During his trip to the region last week, U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken met with P.A. Prime Minister Mohammad Mustafa in Sweimeh, Jordan. He welcomed the P.A.'s plans for administrative reforms—which did not include ending “pay for slay.”

Blinken stressed “the need for full and consistent implementation of those reforms to achieve the aspirations of Palestinians in the West Bank and Gaza,” according to a U.S. readout of the meeting.

“You meet people who think Netanyahu has been an extraordinary wartime leader, something no American I know would dare speak out loud, but still want him gone,” Reuven Fenton told JNS. “You meet others, who hold him responsible for Oct. 7 but don’t see a credible alternative.”
The country’s next government will depend on whether its political leaders can reconcile their competing commitments, or whether voters will again be asked to resolve a deadlock that negotiations could not.
“They will push legislation very hard to end the Iran war, and it’s not inconceivable that they could get a fair amount of Republican support for that,” William Galston of Brookings told JNS.
Millions of Israelis turn out in record numbers for a watershed vote.