Newsletter
Newsletter Support JNS

State Department amends website after critical omission in anti-Semitism definition

This line was omitted: “Drawing comparisons of contemporary Israeli policy to that of the Nazis.”

U.S. State Department Truman Building. Credit: Wikimedia Commons.
U.S. State Department Truman Building. Credit: Wikimedia Commons.

The U.S. State Department has amended its website after a critical omission on its page defining anti-Semitism.

The State Department’s website “Defining Anti-Semitism,” which is based on the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance’s (IHRA) definition of anti-Semitism that was adopted in 2016, originally omitted the line, “Drawing comparisons of contemporary Israeli policy to that of the Nazis.”

While an earlier version of the State Department’s website, in use until 2017, did include the line, it appears that at some point the critical wording was omitted.

However, after some pro-Israel activists noticed the omission, it appears that the State Department has updated the site to include it.

A screenshot of the State Department's website "Defining Anti-Semitism," showing that the addition of the omitted line on Israel. Credit: Screenshot.
A screenshot of the State Department’s website “Defining Anti-Semitism,” showing that the addition of the omitted line on Israel. Credit: Screenshot.

Comparing Israel’s policies to that of Nazis is a familiar anti-Israel trope often used by BDS supporters and other critics of Israel.

“This can be an important tool against those who make a cynical and horrific use of the Jewish holocaust for the purpose of delegitimizing the Jewish state and promote anti-Semitic sentiments in the general public,” Yifa Segal, director of the International Legal Fund, said in a statement. “Unfortunately, many studies show that this rhetoric is widely used in the U.S. today, and including this legal definition will make clear that this type of comparison originates in anti-Semitism and is not a legitimate discourse.”

Anti-Israel politicians, not only in the United States but elsewhere, have been using this comparison quite regularly.

In July, Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.) drew criticism for comparing the anti-Israel BDS movement to previous boycotts of Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union. In Canada, a political candidate from the New Democratic Party in Nova Scotia was also recently ousted for this comparison, and British Labour Party leader Jeremy Corbyn was criticized for speaking at a 2009 protest likening Israel to Nazi Germany.

The president condemned violence “by a lawless mob in Judea and Samaria,” prompting criticism from the national security minister.
Days earlier, a Jewish security group warned police about a heightened security risk at the Chanukah event.
The prominent Jewish Democrat says she will use her “seniority and clout” in a district that has long elected Black representatives.
The first such legal move on behalf of a Palestinian against the terror group at the International Criminal Court has gone unanswered since December.
A 25-year-old faces hate crime charges after two Jewish men were attacked near a Hendon shul.
“I do think perhaps there is the possibility that in the next few hours the world will get some good news,” Washington’s top diplomat said.